Problematising the ‘job-ready graduate’ ideal in Australian higher education: new forms of exclusion in the academy

Abstract Employability agendas now pervade the higher education landscape of many Western nations. In Australia, employability as both a discourse and related set of practices has recently reached fever-pitch as a result of the Job-ready graduates policy reforms, which have generated an image of an ‘ideal’ job-ready graduate who selects a degree in the national interest and develops value-added industry skills throughout their studies. In this paper, we provide a critical appraisal of this ideal, examining the equity implications of the Job-ready graduates reforms by exploring who is included—and by extension, excluded—in the latest expectations placed on students. Drawing on interviews with 44 university students at one Australian public university, we generate three analytical categories to reflect the extent to which each student’s experiences align with the job-ready graduate ideal, characterised as ‘the ideal student,’ ‘the unequal student’ and ‘the excluded student.’ Elaborated through student-focused case studies, our analysis demonstrates how the job-ready graduate reforms ignore the social contexts of students, being implicitly coded with social class, gender, age, and dis/ability-based norms. We argue that the new regimes of employability espoused within the Job-ready graduates reforms stand in tension with longstanding commitments to widen participation in higher education, embedding privilege and further marginalising those historically excluded from the academy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00849-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problematising the ‘job-ready graduate’ ideal in Australian higher education: new forms of exclusion in the academy

Sally Patfield, Leanne Fray, Jennifer Gore
1 citations
The Australian Educational Researcher
Higher Education and Employability
8.93
article

Problematising the ‘job-ready graduate’ ideal in Australian higher education: new forms of exclusion in the academy

Sally Patfield, Leanne Fray, Jennifer Gore
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Employability agendas now pervade the higher education landscape of many Western nations. In Australia, employability as both a discourse and related set of practices has recently reached fever-pitch as a result of the Job-ready graduates policy reforms, which have generated an image of an ‘ideal’ job-ready graduate who selects a degree in the national interest and develops value-added industry skills throughout their studies. In this paper, we provide a critical appraisal of this ideal, examining the equity implications of the Job-ready graduates reforms by exploring who is included—and by extension, excluded—in the latest expectations placed on students. Drawing on interviews with 44 university students at one Australian public university, we generate three analytical categories to reflect the extent to which each student’s experiences align with the job-ready graduate ideal, characterised as ‘the ideal student,’ ‘the unequal student’ and ‘the excluded student.’ Elaborated through student-focused case studies, our analysis demonstrates how the job-ready graduate reforms ignore the social contexts of students, being implicitly coded with social class, gender, age, and dis/ability-based norms. We argue that the new regimes of employability espoused within the Job-ready graduates reforms stand in tension with longstanding commitments to widen participation in higher education, embedding privilege and further marginalising those historically excluded from the academy.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 52(5)
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Newcastle University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education and Employability
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.