Life-Cycle Economics and GHG Emissions of Forest Biomass Harvesting and Utilization for Alternative Value-Added Bioproducts: An Integrated Modeling Framework

The life-cycle economics and greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions of forest biomass harvesting and utilization for value-added bioproducts were comprehensively evaluated via the development of an integrated modeling framework. Taking the eastern U.S. as the case region, the model innovatively integrated field studies, a Bayesian-based statistical learning model, techno-economic analysis, and life-cycle assessment. In specific, by investigating and summarizing the typical forest biomass harvesting systems across the region, the forest biomass harvesting costs were spatially grouped and mapped for four classified subregions across the eastern US. Overall, with 95% confidence the forest biomass harvesting cost is between USD 21.99 and USD 44.33/dry Mg, while the GHG emissions are between 14.79 and 98.80 kg CO2 eq./dry Mg. Furthermore, for the forest biomass utilization for four alternative value-added bioproducts, the minimum selling price (MSP) is USD 177.82/Mg for pellet fuel, USD 110.24/MWh for biopower, USD 1059.4/Mg for biochar, and USD 4.98/gallon for aviation fuel. The life-cycle GHG emissions are 149.80 kg CO2 eq./Mg pellet fuel, 52.22 kg CO2 eq./MWh biopower, 792.12 kg CO2 eq./Mg biochar, and 2.13 kg CO2 eq./gallon aviation fuel, respectively. Considering the uncertainties, 95% confidence intervals of MSPs range from USD 164.77 to USD 190.97/Mg for pellet fuel with an 81.85% probability to be profitable, from USD 100.20 to USD 120.21/MWh for biopower with a 49.38% probability to be profitable, from USD 1000.91 to USD 1109.25/Mg for biochar with a 79.51% probability to be profitable, from USD 4.86 to USD 5.54/gallon for aviation fuel with an 0.03% probability to be profitable. Moreover, the MSPs of pellet fuel and biochar are much less affected by the market changes than those of biopower and aviation fuel. However, the production of biopower and aviation fuel has lower carbon intensities than that of pellet fuel and biochar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060871
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life-Cycle Economics and GHG Emissions of Forest Biomass Harvesting and Utilization for Alternative Value-Added Bioproducts: An Integrated Modeling Framework

Jialin Li, John Vance, Jingxin Wang, Xufeng Zhang
3 citations
Forests
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
2.59
article

Life-Cycle Economics and GHG Emissions of Forest Biomass Harvesting and Utilization for Alternative Value-Added Bioproducts: An Integrated Modeling Framework

Jialin Li, John Vance, Jingxin Wang, Xufeng Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The life-cycle economics and greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions of forest biomass harvesting and utilization for value-added bioproducts were comprehensively evaluated via the development of an integrated modeling framework. Taking the eastern U.S. as the case region, the model innovatively integrated field studies, a Bayesian-based statistical learning model, techno-economic analysis, and life-cycle assessment. In specific, by investigating and summarizing the typical forest biomass harvesting systems across the region, the forest biomass harvesting costs were spatially grouped and mapped for four classified subregions across the eastern US. Overall, with 95% confidence the forest biomass harvesting cost is between USD 21.99 and USD 44.33/dry Mg, while the GHG emissions are between 14.79 and 98.80 kg CO2 eq./dry Mg. Furthermore, for the forest biomass utilization for four alternative value-added bioproducts, the minimum selling price (MSP) is USD 177.82/Mg for pellet fuel, USD 110.24/MWh for biopower, USD 1059.4/Mg for biochar, and USD 4.98/gallon for aviation fuel. The life-cycle GHG emissions are 149.80 kg CO2 eq./Mg pellet fuel, 52.22 kg CO2 eq./MWh biopower, 792.12 kg CO2 eq./Mg biochar, and 2.13 kg CO2 eq./gallon aviation fuel, respectively. Considering the uncertainties, 95% confidence intervals of MSPs range from USD 164.77 to USD 190.97/Mg for pellet fuel with an 81.85% probability to be profitable, from USD 100.20 to USD 120.21/MWh for biopower with a 49.38% probability to be profitable, from USD 1000.91 to USD 1109.25/Mg for biochar with a 79.51% probability to be profitable, from USD 4.86 to USD 5.54/gallon for aviation fuel with an 0.03% probability to be profitable. Moreover, the MSPs of pellet fuel and biochar are much less affected by the market changes than those of biopower and aviation fuel. However, the production of biopower and aviation fuel has lower carbon intensities than that of pellet fuel and biochar.

ForestsVol. 16(6)
West Virginia University (US), North Carolina State University (US), North China Electric Power University (CN), Beijing University of Technology (CN)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Auburn University, West Virginia University, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Beijing Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.