Pore Structure Differences and Influencing Factors of Tight Reservoirs Under Gravity Flow–Delta Sedimentary System in Linnan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin

In tight reservoirs deposited in diverse sedimentary settings, the pore structure governs tight oil enrichment features and sweet-spot distribution. Taking the tight sandstone reservoirs of the lower third member of the Shahejie Formation in the Linnan Subsag of Bohai Bay Basin in China as an example, this study employs XRD to delineate petrological characteristics, while porosity and permeability measurements are used to quantify physical properties. In addition, thin section, SEM, HPMI, NMR, fractal theory, and cathodoluminescence experiments are applied to investigate pore structure characteristics and influencing factors. The results reveal two sedimentary systems: turbidity current and delta front deposits. Turbidite reservoirs exhibit the coarse pore-coarse throats (Type A), medium pore-medium throats (Type B), and fine pore-medium throats (Type C) pore structures. Delta front reservoirs are characterized by medium-pore-coarse-throat (Type D), medium-pore-fine-throat (Type E), and fine-pore-fine-throat (Type F) pore structures. Turbidite reservoirs show more favorable pore structures for oil exploration compared to delta fronts, in which lithofacies and diagenetic facies are the key influences. A genetic model identifies the highest-quality Type A forms in fine sandstone lithofacies under medium compaction–medium cementation–strong dissolution, with pore diameters averaging 10.84 μm in turbidite reservoirs. Conversely, the poorest Type F forms in argillaceous layered siltstone lithofacies under strong compaction, cementation, and weak dissolution diagenetic facies in delta fronts, with pore diameters averaging 0.88 μm. Consequently, the control effect of the pore quality means that Type A has the highest and Type F has the lowest oil-bearing capacity. These findings provide valuable guidance for the classification, evaluation, and exploration of tight oil sweet spots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115800
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pore Structure Differences and Influencing Factors of Tight Reservoirs Under Gravity Flow–Delta Sedimentary System in Linnan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin

Dongxia Chen, Yuchao Wang, Mengya Jiang, Wenzhi Lei et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.86
article

Pore Structure Differences and Influencing Factors of Tight Reservoirs Under Gravity Flow–Delta Sedimentary System in Linnan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin

Dongxia Chen, Yuchao Wang, Mengya Jiang, Wenzhi Lei, Fuwei Wang, Qiaochu Wang, Jialing Chen, Lanxi Rong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In tight reservoirs deposited in diverse sedimentary settings, the pore structure governs tight oil enrichment features and sweet-spot distribution. Taking the tight sandstone reservoirs of the lower third member of the Shahejie Formation in the Linnan Subsag of Bohai Bay Basin in China as an example, this study employs XRD to delineate petrological characteristics, while porosity and permeability measurements are used to quantify physical properties. In addition, thin section, SEM, HPMI, NMR, fractal theory, and cathodoluminescence experiments are applied to investigate pore structure characteristics and influencing factors. The results reveal two sedimentary systems: turbidity current and delta front deposits. Turbidite reservoirs exhibit the coarse pore-coarse throats (Type A), medium pore-medium throats (Type B), and fine pore-medium throats (Type C) pore structures. Delta front reservoirs are characterized by medium-pore-coarse-throat (Type D), medium-pore-fine-throat (Type E), and fine-pore-fine-throat (Type F) pore structures. Turbidite reservoirs show more favorable pore structures for oil exploration compared to delta fronts, in which lithofacies and diagenetic facies are the key influences. A genetic model identifies the highest-quality Type A forms in fine sandstone lithofacies under medium compaction–medium cementation–strong dissolution, with pore diameters averaging 10.84 μm in turbidite reservoirs. Conversely, the poorest Type F forms in argillaceous layered siltstone lithofacies under strong compaction, cementation, and weak dissolution diagenetic facies in delta fronts, with pore diameters averaging 0.88 μm. Consequently, the control effect of the pore quality means that Type A has the highest and Type F has the lowest oil-bearing capacity. These findings provide valuable guidance for the classification, evaluation, and exploration of tight oil sweet spots.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(11)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.