On Implementing Technomorph Biology for Inefficient Computing

It is commonly accepted that ‘the brain computes’ and that it serves as a model for establishing principles of technical (first of all, electronic) computing. Even today, some biological implementation details inspire the implementation of more performant electronic implementations. However, grasping details without context often leads to decreasing operating efficiency. In the cases of those major implementations, the notion of ‘computing’ has an entirely different meaning. We provide the notion of generalized computing from which we derive technical and biological computing, and by showing how the functionalities are implemented, we also highlight what performance losses lead the solution. Both implementations have been developed using a success–failure method, keeping the successful part-solutions (and building on top of them) and replacing a less successful one with another. Both developments proceed from a local minimum of their goal functions to another, but some principles differ fundamentally. Moreover, they apply entirely different principles, and the part-solutions must cooperate with others, so grasping some biological solution without understanding its context and implementing it in the technical solution usually leads to a loss of efficiency. Today, technical systems’ absolute performance seems to be saturated, while their computing and energetic inefficiency are growing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115805
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Implementing Technomorph Biology for Inefficient Computing

János Végh
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
0.81
article

On Implementing Technomorph Biology for Inefficient Computing

János Végh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that ‘the brain computes’ and that it serves as a model for establishing principles of technical (first of all, electronic) computing. Even today, some biological implementation details inspire the implementation of more performant electronic implementations. However, grasping details without context often leads to decreasing operating efficiency. In the cases of those major implementations, the notion of ‘computing’ has an entirely different meaning. We provide the notion of generalized computing from which we derive technical and biological computing, and by showing how the functionalities are implemented, we also highlight what performance losses lead the solution. Both implementations have been developed using a success–failure method, keeping the successful part-solutions (and building on top of them) and replacing a less successful one with another. Both developments proceed from a local minimum of their goal functions to another, but some principles differ fundamentally. Moreover, they apply entirely different principles, and the part-solutions must cooperate with others, so grasping some biological solution without understanding its context and implementing it in the technical solution usually leads to a loss of efficiency. Today, technical systems’ absolute performance seems to be saturated, while their computing and energetic inefficiency are growing.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.