Misinformation: Current directions and new insights.

This special issue presents new insights into how misinformation can shape memory, beliefs, and evidence evaluation. Studies highlight the robustness of the illusory truth effect across languages and formats and explore how encouraging active scrutiny can reduce postevent misinformation effects. They further inspect the notion that false beliefs and judgments can stem from both "lazy" intuitive processing and motivated reasoning and that detection of misinformation and its "fingerprints" can rely on both explicit and tacit knowledge. Studies also test a range of interventions to boost detection of false headlines and deceptive statements and to improve evidence-based reasoning. Findings demonstrate that intervention effectiveness is influenced by individual differences and context factors such as claims' factual ambiguity. Finally, new research on contextual biases shows that knowledge can affect judgment in surprising ways. Overall, the section calls for theoretical integration and nuanced investigation, particularly given current challenges such as artifically generated misinformation and shifting epistemic norms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000229
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misinformation: Current directions and new insights.

Ullrich K. H. Ecker
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Misinformation: Current directions and new insights.

Ullrich K. H. Ecker
article en

Abstract

This special issue presents new insights into how misinformation can shape memory, beliefs, and evidence evaluation. Studies highlight the robustness of the illusory truth effect across languages and formats and explore how encouraging active scrutiny can reduce postevent misinformation effects. They further inspect the notion that false beliefs and judgments can stem from both "lazy" intuitive processing and motivated reasoning and that detection of misinformation and its "fingerprints" can rely on both explicit and tacit knowledge. Studies also test a range of interventions to boost detection of false headlines and deceptive statements and to improve evidence-based reasoning. Findings demonstrate that intervention effectiveness is influenced by individual differences and context factors such as claims' factual ambiguity. Finally, new research on contextual biases shows that knowledge can affect judgment in surprising ways. Overall, the section calls for theoretical integration and nuanced investigation, particularly given current challenges such as artifically generated misinformation and shifting epistemic norms.

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and CognitionVol. 14(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.