Short-Term Efficacy of a Multi-Modal Intervention Program to Improve Custom-Made Footwear Use in People at High Risk of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

<b>Background</b>: Wearing custom-made footwear is key in diabetes-related foot ulcer prevention. However, adhering to wearing footwear is challenging, in particular at home. Evidence-based interventions with proven effect are needed, but scarce. We developed a multi-modal intervention to improve custom-made footwear use, and investigated short-term efficacy. <b>Methods</b>: We used a multidisciplinary multiphase approach to develop a three-modality intervention: structured education, motivational interviewing, and custom-made indoor footwear. To assess efficacy, we measured mean 2-week wearing time of custom-made footwear with a validated sensor, at baseline and after three months (primary outcome), and in the two weeks directly before and after each modality was administered (secondary outcomes). We assessed differences between timepoints using within-subjects paired <i>t</i>-tests. <b>Results</b>: 53 participants with high risk for ulceration were included: 30 with low [<8 h/day] baseline adherence), 17% females, mean age 66 (SD: 10) years, all with peripheral neuropathy and a recent foot ulcer (mean time since healing: 6 (SD: 9) months). Wearing time increased non-significantly from 4.0 (SD: 2.5) at baseline to 5.5 (SD: 4.3) after three months in the low adherence group (<i>p</i> = 0.068); this was 11.9 (SD: 2.3) to 12.0 (SD: 2.8) in the high adherence group (<i>p</i> = 0.898). Following provision of indoor footwear, wearing time increased significantly for low baseline adherence (∆2.7 h/day (95% CI: 1.0-4.4; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and high baseline adherence (∆2.0 h/day (95% CI: 0.5-3.4; <i>p</i> = 0.010). Following structured education, wearing time increased non-significantly in those with low baseline adherence (∆1.0 h/day (95% CI: -0.2-2.2; <i>p</i> = 0.098). Following motivational interviewing, wearing time remained similar in both groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: The multi-modal intervention program combining structured education, motivational interviewing and custom-made indoor footwear did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the wearing time of custom-made footwear after three months. However, significant improvements followed the provision of indoor footwear, and clinically relevant improvements followed structured education in people with low adherence, providing avenues for implementation and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113635
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-Term Efficacy of a Multi-Modal Intervention Program to Improve Custom-Made Footwear Use in People at High Risk of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Sicco A. Bus, Jaap J. van Netten, Maarten J. M. Merkx, Lisa E. Vossen et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
2.59
article

Short-Term Efficacy of a Multi-Modal Intervention Program to Improve Custom-Made Footwear Use in People at High Risk of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Sicco A. Bus, Jaap J. van Netten, Maarten J. M. Merkx, Lisa E. Vossen, David F.G.J. Wolthuis, Faye M. Driebergen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Wearing custom-made footwear is key in diabetes-related foot ulcer prevention. However, adhering to wearing footwear is challenging, in particular at home. Evidence-based interventions with proven effect are needed, but scarce. We developed a multi-modal intervention to improve custom-made footwear use, and investigated short-term efficacy. <b>Methods</b>: We used a multidisciplinary multiphase approach to develop a three-modality intervention: structured education, motivational interviewing, and custom-made indoor footwear. To assess efficacy, we measured mean 2-week wearing time of custom-made footwear with a validated sensor, at baseline and after three months (primary outcome), and in the two weeks directly before and after each modality was administered (secondary outcomes). We assessed differences between timepoints using within-subjects paired <i>t</i>-tests. <b>Results</b>: 53 participants with high risk for ulceration were included: 30 with low [<8 h/day] baseline adherence), 17% females, mean age 66 (SD: 10) years, all with peripheral neuropathy and a recent foot ulcer (mean time since healing: 6 (SD: 9) months). Wearing time increased non-significantly from 4.0 (SD: 2.5) at baseline to 5.5 (SD: 4.3) after three months in the low adherence group (<i>p</i> = 0.068); this was 11.9 (SD: 2.3) to 12.0 (SD: 2.8) in the high adherence group (<i>p</i> = 0.898). Following provision of indoor footwear, wearing time increased significantly for low baseline adherence (∆2.7 h/day (95% CI: 1.0-4.4; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and high baseline adherence (∆2.0 h/day (95% CI: 0.5-3.4; <i>p</i> = 0.010). Following structured education, wearing time increased non-significantly in those with low baseline adherence (∆1.0 h/day (95% CI: -0.2-2.2; <i>p</i> = 0.098). Following motivational interviewing, wearing time remained similar in both groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: The multi-modal intervention program combining structured education, motivational interviewing and custom-made indoor footwear did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the wearing time of custom-made footwear after three months. However, significant improvements followed the provision of indoor footwear, and clinically relevant improvements followed structured education in people with low adherence, providing avenues for implementation and research.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.