The Inscrutable Code?
Public administration in the United Kingdom increasingly features automated decision-making. From predictive policing and prisoner categorisation, to asylum applications and tenancy relationships, automated government exists across various domains. This article examines an underlying issue concerning government automated decision-making systems: the lack of public scrutiny they receive across pre- to post-deployment. Branches of the state tasked with scrutinising government, namely Parliament and the courts, appear outmoded to address this problem. These circumstances prompt a concern of where the public can expect safeguards from government overreach manifested through computer software. Two regulatory solutions are proposed. First, mandating pre-deployment impact assessments of automated decision-making systems intended for use by government, either during their design, or before procurement. Second, incorporating algorithmic auditing as part of reinforcing the duty of candour in judicial review, so as to better inform courts about specific systems and the data underpinning them.
Authors
- Richard Mackenzie-Gray Scott
- Lilian Edwards
Institutions
- Turing Institute (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Technology and Regulation
- Published
- 2025-03-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.71265/sxb9dj82
- Primary Topic
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- British Academy
- University of Oxford
- Arts and Humanities Research Council