AI and Civil Liability: Contrasting Algerian Legislation with the European Union’s Regulatory Approach

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems poses unprecedented challenges to civil liability regimes, particularly in attributing fault and ensuring victim compensation.This paper conducts a comparative legal analysis of Algeria's fault-based civil liability framework, rooted in the 1975 Civil Code, and the European Union's risk-based approach under the Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and the revised Product Liability Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/2853).While Algeria's system struggles with AI's opacity and autonomy, the EU's proactive model offers strict liability and transparency mechanisms to address these complexities.Through doctrinal analysis, case studies, and comparative methods, this study identifies gaps in Algerian law and proposes reforms inspired by the EU, including risk-based classifications and mandatory insurance.The findings contribute to global AI governance discourse, offering a roadmap for civil law jurisdictions to adapt to technological advancements while balancing innovation and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56334/sei/8.5.15
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and Civil Liability: Contrasting Algerian Legislation with the European Union’s Regulatory Approach

Nadjib Beroual
Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

AI and Civil Liability: Contrasting Algerian Legislation with the European Union’s Regulatory Approach

Nadjib Beroual
article en

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems poses unprecedented challenges to civil liability regimes, particularly in attributing fault and ensuring victim compensation.This paper conducts a comparative legal analysis of Algeria's fault-based civil liability framework, rooted in the 1975 Civil Code, and the European Union's risk-based approach under the Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and the revised Product Liability Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/2853).While Algeria's system struggles with AI's opacity and autonomy, the EU's proactive model offers strict liability and transparency mechanisms to address these complexities.Through doctrinal analysis, case studies, and comparative methods, this study identifies gaps in Algerian law and proposes reforms inspired by the EU, including risk-based classifications and mandatory insurance.The findings contribute to global AI governance discourse, offering a roadmap for civil law jurisdictions to adapt to technological advancements while balancing innovation and accountability.

Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern ProblemsVol. 8(5)
University of Batna 1 (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.