Abstract CT001: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors added to SOC (surgery + postoperative radiotherapy [PORT] ± concurrent chemotherapy) yielded promising efficacy results in participants (pts) with LA HNSCC in early phase studies. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study (NCT03765918) evaluates neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in this population. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed resectable LA HNSCC (larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity stage III/IVA; oropharyngeal stage III/IVA p16− or stage III T4 N0-2 p16+) were randomized 1:1 to 2 cycles neoadjuvant and 3 cycles concurrent (during PORT) and 12 cycles adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W + SOC vs SOC. SOC included surgery for all pts + PORT 60 Gy in 30 fractions for low-risk, PORT 66 Gy in 33 fractions + 3 cycles concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W for high-risk, and PORT 70 Gy in 35 fractions + cisplatin for gross residual disease. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints are major pathological response (mPR; ≤10% invasive SCC) by blinded independent pathologist review and overall survival (OS). Efficacy endpoints are sequentially assessed in 3 populations: pts with tumors with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10, CPS ≥1, and all pts. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are graded per CTCAE v4.03. Results: From December 2018 to October 2023, 363 pts were randomized to pembrolizumab + SOC and 351 to SOC. As of 25 July 2024 (first interim analysis), median follow-up was 38.3 months (range, 9.0-66.5). Baseline demographics were balanced between arms. The CPS ≥10 population included 234 pts in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm and 231 in the SOC arm; the CPS ≥1 population included 347 and 335 pts, respectively. EFS (CPS ≥10: median 59.7 vs 26.9 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, P=.00217; CPS ≥1: 59.7 vs 29.6 months, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P=.00140; all pts: 51.8 vs 30.4 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, P=.00411) and mPR rate difference (CPS ≥10: 13.7%, 95% CI 9.7-18.7, P<.00001; CPS ≥1: 9.8%, 95% CI 7.0-13.3, P<.00001; all pts: 9.3%, 95% CI 6.7-12.8, P<.00001) analyses were statistically significant with pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in all prespecified populations. Additional follow-up for OS is ongoing. Grade ≥3 TRAE frequency was similar (44.6% with pembrolizumab + SOC vs 42.9% with SOC); 4 and 1 deaths occurred due to TRAE, respectively. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 43.2% of pts with pembrolizumab + SOC, most commonly hypothyroidism (24.7%). Conclusions: Adding neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab to SOC significantly improved EFS and mPR rate difference in pts with resectable LA HNSCC independent of CPS. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was consistent with expectations. Citation Format: Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad, Yungan Tao, Christophe Le Tourneau, Nancy Y. Lee, William Westra, Rebecca Chernock, Makoto Tahara, Kevin Harrington, Arkadiy L. Klochikhin, Irene Braña, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, Brett G.M. Hughes, Marc Oliva, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Tsutomu Ueda, Tomasz Rutkowski, Ursula Schroeder, Paul-Stefan Mauz, Thorsten Fuereder, Simon Laban, Nobuhiko Oridate, Aron Popovtzer, Nicolas Mach, Yevhen Korobko, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT001.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-ct001
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract CT001: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study

Thorsten Fuereder, A L Klochikhin, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Makoto Tahara et al.
7 citations
Cancer Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
7.32
article

Abstract CT001: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study

Thorsten Fuereder, A L Klochikhin, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Makoto Tahara, Kimberly Benjamin, Rebecca D. Chernock, Marc Oliva, Nicolas Mach, William H. Westra, Aron Popovtzer, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, R. Bryan Bell, Tomasz A. Rutkowski, Nobuhiko Oridate, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Brett Hughes, Nancy Y. Lee, Burak Gümüşçü, Simon Laban, Christophe Le Tourneau, Ravindra Uppaluri, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Kevin Joseph Harrington, Irene Braña, Robert I. Haddad, Tsutomu Ueda, Ursula C. Schroeder, Cristina P. Rodriguez, Douglas Adkins, Yungan Tao, Paul‐Stefan Mauz, Yevhen Korobko, Cole Manschot
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors added to SOC (surgery + postoperative radiotherapy [PORT] ± concurrent chemotherapy) yielded promising efficacy results in participants (pts) with LA HNSCC in early phase studies. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study (NCT03765918) evaluates neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in this population. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed resectable LA HNSCC (larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity stage III/IVA; oropharyngeal stage III/IVA p16− or stage III T4 N0-2 p16+) were randomized 1:1 to 2 cycles neoadjuvant and 3 cycles concurrent (during PORT) and 12 cycles adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W + SOC vs SOC. SOC included surgery for all pts + PORT 60 Gy in 30 fractions for low-risk, PORT 66 Gy in 33 fractions + 3 cycles concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W for high-risk, and PORT 70 Gy in 35 fractions + cisplatin for gross residual disease. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints are major pathological response (mPR; ≤10% invasive SCC) by blinded independent pathologist review and overall survival (OS). Efficacy endpoints are sequentially assessed in 3 populations: pts with tumors with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10, CPS ≥1, and all pts. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are graded per CTCAE v4.03. Results: From December 2018 to October 2023, 363 pts were randomized to pembrolizumab + SOC and 351 to SOC. As of 25 July 2024 (first interim analysis), median follow-up was 38.3 months (range, 9.0-66.5). Baseline demographics were balanced between arms. The CPS ≥10 population included 234 pts in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm and 231 in the SOC arm; the CPS ≥1 population included 347 and 335 pts, respectively. EFS (CPS ≥10: median 59.7 vs 26.9 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, P=.00217; CPS ≥1: 59.7 vs 29.6 months, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P=.00140; all pts: 51.8 vs 30.4 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, P=.00411) and mPR rate difference (CPS ≥10: 13.7%, 95% CI 9.7-18.7, P<.00001; CPS ≥1: 9.8%, 95% CI 7.0-13.3, P<.00001; all pts: 9.3%, 95% CI 6.7-12.8, P<.00001) analyses were statistically significant with pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in all prespecified populations. Additional follow-up for OS is ongoing. Grade ≥3 TRAE frequency was similar (44.6% with pembrolizumab + SOC vs 42.9% with SOC); 4 and 1 deaths occurred due to TRAE, respectively. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 43.2% of pts with pembrolizumab + SOC, most commonly hypothyroidism (24.7%). Conclusions: Adding neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab to SOC significantly improved EFS and mPR rate difference in pts with resectable LA HNSCC independent of CPS. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was consistent with expectations. Citation Format: Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad, Yungan Tao, Christophe Le Tourneau, Nancy Y. Lee, William Westra, Rebecca Chernock, Makoto Tahara, Kevin Harrington, Arkadiy L. Klochikhin, Irene Braña, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, Brett G.M. Hughes, Marc Oliva, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Tsutomu Ueda, Tomasz Rutkowski, Ursula Schroeder, Paul-Stefan Mauz, Thorsten Fuereder, Simon Laban, Nobuhiko Oridate, Aron Popovtzer, Nicolas Mach, Yevhen Korobko, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT001.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Geneva (CH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Providence Portland Medical Center (US), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Kettering University (US), Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (BR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), National Cancer Institute (UA), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), Hospital do Desterro (PT), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES), Rutgers Cancer Institute (US), Hospital CUF Descobertas, Medical University of Vienna (AT), Institut Curie (FR), Yokohama City University (JP), University of Lübeck (DE), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.