Burden: A qualitative analysis

• Youth care for multi-problem families can create, exacerbate, or even be harmful to these families. • Interviews with 10 parents, 10 natural mentors, 10 youths, and 10 professionals. • Interviews give insight into factors contributing to and lived experiences of burden. • Mental burden is the most experienced burden from all perspectives. • Balancing expectations and burdens could enhance effectiveness in youth care. Navigating the youth care system may present significant challenges for families and professionals. These challenges may lead to feelings of strain and may contribute to a broader sense of burden among all involved. This qualitative study aims to understand how youth, parents, natural mentors (YIMs), and professionals working with a YIM and the family perceive burden in youth care and the factors contributing to it. Conducted across four Dutch regions, the study involved semi-structured interviews and rich pictures with ten individuals from each perspective. Based on participants’ responses, inductive coding was employed to identify clusters, themes, and subthemes. Participants described the burden in emotional, mental, and physical terms, with mental burden being the most frequently mentioned across all perspectives. Youth reported feelings of powerlessness, while parents expressed frustration over stagnation. YIMs struggled with their dual roles, and YIM professionals felt pressured by conflicting expectations. Factors contributing to this burden involved deficiencies in personal and social agency, challenges in collaboration, and unmet expectations regarding professionals and the youth care system. All participants identified a lack of agency and unmet expectations. YIMs encountered an unequal power balance in their collaboration with YIM professionals, while YIM professionals faced difficulties in interacting with other professionals and parents. The findings highlight the need to address the sources of burden in youth care. Clarifying mutual expectations and collaboratively addressing burdens could improve experiences within youth care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108353
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Burden: A qualitative analysis

Marion Van Hattum, Floor van Rooij, Chris H. Z. Kuiper, Suzanne de Ruig et al.
1 citations
Children and Youth Services Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
3.13
article

Burden: A qualitative analysis

Marion Van Hattum, Floor van Rooij, Chris H. Z. Kuiper, Suzanne de Ruig, Jasmijn Bres
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Youth care for multi-problem families can create, exacerbate, or even be harmful to these families. • Interviews with 10 parents, 10 natural mentors, 10 youths, and 10 professionals. • Interviews give insight into factors contributing to and lived experiences of burden. • Mental burden is the most experienced burden from all perspectives. • Balancing expectations and burdens could enhance effectiveness in youth care. Navigating the youth care system may present significant challenges for families and professionals. These challenges may lead to feelings of strain and may contribute to a broader sense of burden among all involved. This qualitative study aims to understand how youth, parents, natural mentors (YIMs), and professionals working with a YIM and the family perceive burden in youth care and the factors contributing to it. Conducted across four Dutch regions, the study involved semi-structured interviews and rich pictures with ten individuals from each perspective. Based on participants’ responses, inductive coding was employed to identify clusters, themes, and subthemes. Participants described the burden in emotional, mental, and physical terms, with mental burden being the most frequently mentioned across all perspectives. Youth reported feelings of powerlessness, while parents expressed frustration over stagnation. YIMs struggled with their dual roles, and YIM professionals felt pressured by conflicting expectations. Factors contributing to this burden involved deficiencies in personal and social agency, challenges in collaboration, and unmet expectations regarding professionals and the youth care system. All participants identified a lack of agency and unmet expectations. YIMs encountered an unequal power balance in their collaboration with YIM professionals, while YIM professionals faced difficulties in interacting with other professionals and parents. The findings highlight the need to address the sources of burden in youth care. Clarifying mutual expectations and collaboratively addressing burdens could improve experiences within youth care.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 175
HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL), C Care Orthopedics (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Policy and Management
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.