Author-paid publication fees corrupt science and should be abandoned

Abstract Author-paid publication fees, often associated with so-called “gold” open access journals, lead to the corruption of science by incentivizing the publication of low-quality research and exacerbate inequalities between institutions that are prestigious and well-funded and those that are less so. Pressures to pay article processing fees on the part of funding agencies and university libraries waste research funding and stymie efforts to establish more sustainable publishing systems. We recommend a total abandonment of author-paid publication fees for academic research, the publication of which is typically a public good yet serves to enrich publishers while degrading research outputs. Alternative approaches related to “green” and “diamond” open access are cautiously recommended, as is a refocusing on society-run journals. We encourage the search for alternative models for evaluating and publicizing scientific research, including the formal modelling of competing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Author-paid publication fees corrupt science and should be abandoned

Thomas J. H. Morgan, Paul E. Smaldino
2 citations
Science and Public Policy
Academic Publishing and Open Access
8.34
article

Author-paid publication fees corrupt science and should be abandoned

Thomas J. H. Morgan, Paul E. Smaldino
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Author-paid publication fees, often associated with so-called “gold” open access journals, lead to the corruption of science by incentivizing the publication of low-quality research and exacerbate inequalities between institutions that are prestigious and well-funded and those that are less so. Pressures to pay article processing fees on the part of funding agencies and university libraries waste research funding and stymie efforts to establish more sustainable publishing systems. We recommend a total abandonment of author-paid publication fees for academic research, the publication of which is typically a public good yet serves to enrich publishers while degrading research outputs. Alternative approaches related to “green” and “diamond” open access are cautiously recommended, as is a refocusing on society-run journals. We encourage the search for alternative models for evaluating and publicizing scientific research, including the formal modelling of competing approaches.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 52(5)
Santa Fe Institute (US), University of California, Merced (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.