Biomechanical Behavior of Different Distributions of Zygoma and Pterygoid Implants in Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

This study was aimed to evaluate 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) of stress distribution in zygomatic and pterygoid implants in atrophic posterior maxilla. A 3D FEA model of an edentulous, atrophic maxilla was developed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Four different implant configurations were evaluated: 2 zygomatic+2 pterygoid+3 anterior implants, 2 zygomatic+3 anterior implants, 2 zygomatic+2 pterygoid+2 anterior implants, and 2 zygomatic+2 anterior implants. Virtual implants were placed and a prosthetic superstructure was designed for each model. FEA was conducted to analyze stress distribution within the bone, implants, and prosthesis under simulated masticatory loads. Stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, abutments, and prosthetic framework was visualized through von Mises stress maps, while maximum principal stresses and micromotion were evaluated to determine implant stability and osseointegration potential. FEA revealed notable variations in stress distribution among the 4 models. Model 4 exhibited the highest peri-implant bone stress on the zygomatic left implant. Micromovement was lowest in model 4 and highest in model 2. Abutment-level stress analysis in model 3 showed the lowest stress on zygomatic implants and pterygoid implants, whereas model 4 recorded the highest stresses on zygomatic implants. Prosthetic framework stress was highest in model 2, while prosthetic superstructure stress showed minimal variation across models. Inclusion of pterygoid implants alongside zygomatic and anterior implants effectively reduces stress concentrations and micromovements in the atrophic maxilla, enhancing biomechanical stability and load distribution. Models without pterygoid implants showed increased stress on zygomatic implants, potentially compromising long-term stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011507
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Behavior of Different Distributions of Zygoma and Pterygoid Implants in Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

Yasser Nabil El Hadidi, Noura Darwish, Moustafa Taha
2 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.58
article

Biomechanical Behavior of Different Distributions of Zygoma and Pterygoid Implants in Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

Yasser Nabil El Hadidi, Noura Darwish, Moustafa Taha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) of stress distribution in zygomatic and pterygoid implants in atrophic posterior maxilla. A 3D FEA model of an edentulous, atrophic maxilla was developed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Four different implant configurations were evaluated: 2 zygomatic+2 pterygoid+3 anterior implants, 2 zygomatic+3 anterior implants, 2 zygomatic+2 pterygoid+2 anterior implants, and 2 zygomatic+2 anterior implants. Virtual implants were placed and a prosthetic superstructure was designed for each model. FEA was conducted to analyze stress distribution within the bone, implants, and prosthesis under simulated masticatory loads. Stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, abutments, and prosthetic framework was visualized through von Mises stress maps, while maximum principal stresses and micromotion were evaluated to determine implant stability and osseointegration potential. FEA revealed notable variations in stress distribution among the 4 models. Model 4 exhibited the highest peri-implant bone stress on the zygomatic left implant. Micromovement was lowest in model 4 and highest in model 2. Abutment-level stress analysis in model 3 showed the lowest stress on zygomatic implants and pterygoid implants, whereas model 4 recorded the highest stresses on zygomatic implants. Prosthetic framework stress was highest in model 2, while prosthetic superstructure stress showed minimal variation across models. Inclusion of pterygoid implants alongside zygomatic and anterior implants effectively reduces stress concentrations and micromovements in the atrophic maxilla, enhancing biomechanical stability and load distribution. Models without pterygoid implants showed increased stress on zygomatic implants, potentially compromising long-term stability.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(7)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biomechanical Behavior of Different Distributions of Zygoma and Pterygoid Implants in Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis — Yasser Nabil El Hadidi, Noura Darwish, et al. · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS