Ecosystem services in giant panda habitats and the Giant Panda National Park: A decade of insight (2011–2021)

The giant panda habitats, especially the Giant Panda National Park (GPNP), play an important role in China's “Two Screens and Three Belts” ecological security strategic pattern. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ecological restoration in giant panda habitats by comparing the differences in land use structure, quantity, and ecosystem service value (ESV) between the GPNP and non-GPNP areas within it from 2011 to 2021, and the possible driving factors behind ESV heterogeneity are revealed. Our findings uncover profound implications of the national park pilot scheme on ESV in giant panda habitats: a remarkable increase in ecological land, reaching 1,430 square kilometers, with non-ecological land primarily converted into ecological space through reforestation and afforestation initiatives. The ESV within GPNP displayed a distinctive trajectory, initially declining then rebounding, predominantly driven by forest land and water. In GPNP, natural factors predominate as chief ESV contributors. Contrarily, the surroundings experienced varying influences from both natural and human activities until 2015, followed by a distinct shift in ESV regulation under the GPNP’s establishment, suggesting a dominance of natural factors afterward. This research highlights the positive impact of establishing a national park, not only enhancing ESV within its boundaries but also spillover effects on adjacent habitats, culminating in a consistent ESV uplift across the study area. These findings contribute valuable insights into understanding the restorative effects of the GPNP and inform the broader strategy for ecological conservation and management. • Assess restoration in panda habitats by comparison between GPNP and non-GPNP areas. • Uncover national park pilot's impact and drivers of ESV in panda habitats. • In GPNP, ESV dips then rebounds, led by natural factors. • Highlight positive role of GPNP that enhancing ESV and having spillover effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100731
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecosystem services in giant panda habitats and the Giant Panda National Park: A decade of insight (2011–2021)

Yufeng Ma, Yuanbin Zhang, Bin Wang, Kun Yan et al.
1 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Ecosystem services in giant panda habitats and the Giant Panda National Park: A decade of insight (2011–2021)

Yufeng Ma, Yuanbin Zhang, Bin Wang, Kun Yan, Hao Jiang, Weiguo Tu, Chunlan Bu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The giant panda habitats, especially the Giant Panda National Park (GPNP), play an important role in China's “Two Screens and Three Belts” ecological security strategic pattern. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ecological restoration in giant panda habitats by comparing the differences in land use structure, quantity, and ecosystem service value (ESV) between the GPNP and non-GPNP areas within it from 2011 to 2021, and the possible driving factors behind ESV heterogeneity are revealed. Our findings uncover profound implications of the national park pilot scheme on ESV in giant panda habitats: a remarkable increase in ecological land, reaching 1,430 square kilometers, with non-ecological land primarily converted into ecological space through reforestation and afforestation initiatives. The ESV within GPNP displayed a distinctive trajectory, initially declining then rebounding, predominantly driven by forest land and water. In GPNP, natural factors predominate as chief ESV contributors. Contrarily, the surroundings experienced varying influences from both natural and human activities until 2015, followed by a distinct shift in ESV regulation under the GPNP’s establishment, suggesting a dominance of natural factors afterward. This research highlights the positive impact of establishing a national park, not only enhancing ESV within its boundaries but also spillover effects on adjacent habitats, culminating in a consistent ESV uplift across the study area. These findings contribute valuable insights into understanding the restorative effects of the GPNP and inform the broader strategy for ecological conservation and management. • Assess restoration in panda habitats by comparison between GPNP and non-GPNP areas. • Uncover national park pilot's impact and drivers of ESV in panda habitats. • In GPNP, ESV dips then rebounds, led by natural factors. • Highlight positive role of GPNP that enhancing ESV and having spillover effects.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 27
Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment (CN), Sichuan Provincial Academy of Natural Resource Sciences (CN)
Sichuan Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.