A Transdisciplinary Framework to Bridge Science–Policy–Development Gaps in Global Land Management Initiatives

Effective implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) remains a major challenge worldwide because of its weak integration within the domains of science, policy, and development practice. Based on global analyses of soil erosion risk and the degree of implementation of SLM research, policies, and practices at the country level, we propose a transdisciplinary framework to address soil erosion through SLM. In the analysis, we used indices of the policy-development, science-policy, and science-development interfaces to evaluate the overall science-policy-development interface (SPDI) in 236 countries. Over 190 countries (81%) were found to be currently facing moderate or high risk of increased soil erosion from two or more erosion processes, and 182 countries (77%) were found to have a SPDI level that was lower than their soil erosion risk implying the urgent need for a transdisciplinary framework that supports the implementation of future soil erosion research and development projects. Our proposed transdisciplinary framework comprises seven stages, starting from "shared research framing" and ending with "ex-post evaluation". The framework's practical application is discussed in the context of a recent project, emphasizing the need for country-specific studies to develop tailored frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Challenges
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202400261
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Transdisciplinary Framework to Bridge Science–Policy–Development Gaps in Global Land Management Initiatives

Ermias Aynekulu, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Panos Panagos et al.
Global Challenges
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

A Transdisciplinary Framework to Bridge Science–Policy–Development Gaps in Global Land Management Initiatives

Ermias Aynekulu, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Panos Panagos, Walter Simon, Ayele Almaw Fenta, Takeshi Abe, Borrelli Pasquale, Peri Pablo
article en

Abstract

Effective implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) remains a major challenge worldwide because of its weak integration within the domains of science, policy, and development practice. Based on global analyses of soil erosion risk and the degree of implementation of SLM research, policies, and practices at the country level, we propose a transdisciplinary framework to address soil erosion through SLM. In the analysis, we used indices of the policy-development, science-policy, and science-development interfaces to evaluate the overall science-policy-development interface (SPDI) in 236 countries. Over 190 countries (81%) were found to be currently facing moderate or high risk of increased soil erosion from two or more erosion processes, and 182 countries (77%) were found to have a SPDI level that was lower than their soil erosion risk implying the urgent need for a transdisciplinary framework that supports the implementation of future soil erosion research and development projects. Our proposed transdisciplinary framework comprises seven stages, starting from "shared research framing" and ending with "ex-post evaluation". The framework's practical application is discussed in the context of a recent project, emphasizing the need for country-specific studies to develop tailored frameworks.

Global ChallengesVol. 9(8)
Australian National University (AU), Roma Tre University (IT), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), University of Basel (CH), European Commission (BE), Charles Darwin University (AU), Joint Research Centre (IT), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR), Tottori University (JP), World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.