Need for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) in Adult Day Services in Germany—A Nationwide Survey

The aim of this study was to survey the need for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) of adults with disabilities and high support needs in adult day services in Germany. In addition to individual data, organizational information was collected. The managers, the group leaders, the AAC specialists and the staff of all adult day services in Germany were invited to participate in an online survey. 91 staff members from 50 institutions provided information on 719 individuals in their care. From these staff members perspective 75% of the 719 clients had a need for AAC and 45% were provided with AAC (coverage rate 60%). Non-symbolic communication approaches for beginning communicators (74%) and low-tech communication book, boards, and card (65%) were used significantly more often than high-tech AAC systems (45%). For about three quarters of the people served, the staff was satisfied with the provision of AAC, but for just under a quarter, they were not. The most frequently cited reasons for dissatisfaction were lack of time/personnel, material resources and skills. Also, of the 193 facility managers surveyed, only 45% consider the available resources to be sufficient. There is a need for more nationwide surveys at the levels of society, organization and individual, differentiated by age groups, types of disability and services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.135016
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Need for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) in Adult Day Services in Germany—A Nationwide Survey

Gregor Renner, Karin Terfloth
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Need for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) in Adult Day Services in Germany—A Nationwide Survey

Gregor Renner, Karin Terfloth
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to survey the need for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) of adults with disabilities and high support needs in adult day services in Germany. In addition to individual data, organizational information was collected. The managers, the group leaders, the AAC specialists and the staff of all adult day services in Germany were invited to participate in an online survey. 91 staff members from 50 institutions provided information on 719 individuals in their care. From these staff members perspective 75% of the 719 clients had a need for AAC and 45% were provided with AAC (coverage rate 60%). Non-symbolic communication approaches for beginning communicators (74%) and low-tech communication book, boards, and card (65%) were used significantly more often than high-tech AAC systems (45%). For about three quarters of the people served, the staff was satisfied with the provision of AAC, but for just under a quarter, they were not. The most frequently cited reasons for dissatisfaction were lack of time/personnel, material resources and skills. Also, of the 193 facility managers surveyed, only 45% consider the available resources to be sufficient. There is a need for more nationwide surveys at the levels of society, organization and individual, differentiated by age groups, types of disability and services.

Open Journal of Social SciencesVol. 13(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.