Does it matter where you bribe? MNE bribery, social norms and legitimacy

Purpose This study examines the relationship between revelations of bribery by multinational enterprises (MNEs) in foreign markets and negative social media coverage of these firms. Drawing on neoinstitutional theory and social norms research, it predicts that negative social media reactions to corruption revelations will be moderated by host country corruption levels. Design/methodology/approach This study uses corruption data from 168 MNEs charged under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and approximately 1 million tweets related to these firms' corrupt activities in over 80 countries. Findings We find significant negative social media reactions to corruption revelations in the host country, the sanctioning country and globally. Social media reactions were weaker when bribery took place in highly corrupt countries. Originality/value This study takes a novel approach to researching the potential risks of engaging in corrupt activities by leveraging multi-country social media data from Twitter/X.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cross Cultural & Strategic Management
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-06-2024-0130
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does it matter where you bribe? MNE bribery, social norms and legitimacy

Maximilian Stallkamp
1 citations
Cross Cultural & Strategic Management
Corruption and Economic Development
4.20
article

Does it matter where you bribe? MNE bribery, social norms and legitimacy

Maximilian Stallkamp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the relationship between revelations of bribery by multinational enterprises (MNEs) in foreign markets and negative social media coverage of these firms. Drawing on neoinstitutional theory and social norms research, it predicts that negative social media reactions to corruption revelations will be moderated by host country corruption levels. Design/methodology/approach This study uses corruption data from 168 MNEs charged under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and approximately 1 million tweets related to these firms' corrupt activities in over 80 countries. Findings We find significant negative social media reactions to corruption revelations in the host country, the sanctioning country and globally. Social media reactions were weaker when bribery took place in highly corrupt countries. Originality/value This study takes a novel approach to researching the potential risks of engaging in corrupt activities by leveraging multi-country social media data from Twitter/X.

Cross Cultural & Strategic ManagementVol. 32(3)
East Carolina University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corruption and Economic Development
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does it matter where you bribe? MNE bribery, social norms and legitimacy — Maximilian Stallkamp · Cross Cultural & Strategic Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS