Making Sense of Portugal’s Baselines around the Archipelagos of Madeira and the Azores

Abstract Mid-ocean or off-lying archipelagos of non-archipelagic States are not addressed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( LOSC ), the correct understanding being that this is not a lacunae and that these archipelagos cannot be subject to the archipelagic regime. Nevertheless, some States have drawn archipelagic baselines surrounding such archipelagos, despite objections by other States. One example of such contradictory State practice is that of Portugal, albeit improperly mentioned by both claiming and opposing States. Portugal has no archipelagic claim and should not constitute supporting evidence (of the formation) of a rule of customary international law allowing non-archipelagic States to draw archipelagic baselines around mid-ocean or off-lying archipelagos. Moreover, Portugal’s pre- LOSC baselines around Madeira and the Azores are inconsistent with the Convention and Portugal’s Constitution and need to be sorted. This article examines Portugal’s baselines around Madeira and the Azores in an attempt to clarify the matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10239
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Sense of Portugal’s Baselines around the Archipelagos of Madeira and the Azores

Vasco Becker-Weinberg
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

Making Sense of Portugal’s Baselines around the Archipelagos of Madeira and the Azores

Vasco Becker-Weinberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mid-ocean or off-lying archipelagos of non-archipelagic States are not addressed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( LOSC ), the correct understanding being that this is not a lacunae and that these archipelagos cannot be subject to the archipelagic regime. Nevertheless, some States have drawn archipelagic baselines surrounding such archipelagos, despite objections by other States. One example of such contradictory State practice is that of Portugal, albeit improperly mentioned by both claiming and opposing States. Portugal has no archipelagic claim and should not constitute supporting evidence (of the formation) of a rule of customary international law allowing non-archipelagic States to draw archipelagic baselines around mid-ocean or off-lying archipelagos. Moreover, Portugal’s pre- LOSC baselines around Madeira and the Azores are inconsistent with the Convention and Portugal’s Constitution and need to be sorted. This article examines Portugal’s baselines around Madeira and the Azores in an attempt to clarify the matter.

The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.