Peace Mediation in the Emerging Multipolar Order: Implications of China’s Growing Engagement in Myanmar’s Civil War

Abstract In the 21st century, peacemaking is subject to a changing international order in which rising powers play a growing role. China’s mediation in Myanmar’s civil war is a case in point: since the international peace architecture has little access to the conflict. This paper contrasts divergent theoretical assumptions on the impact of multipolarity on peace processes with an in-depth examination of China’s strategy. For analysts of the emerging multipolar order, this research indicates that the optimistic assumptions of Mignolo’s pluriversal and Acharya’s multiplex theory might not be met by the rise of new actors in peacemaking. Instead, China’s mediation in Myanmar suggests that multipolarity favors geopolitics at the expense of emancipatory movements. China’s growing involvement in peace processes worldwide confirms recent scholarship on the lack of conflict resolution tools in the multipolar order, rendering multipolarity prone to instability and condemning emancipatory movements to permanent subjugation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian international studies review
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/2667078x-bja10044
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peace Mediation in the Emerging Multipolar Order: Implications of China’s Growing Engagement in Myanmar’s Civil War

Sandra Pogodda, Htet Lynn Oo
Asian international studies review
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

Peace Mediation in the Emerging Multipolar Order: Implications of China’s Growing Engagement in Myanmar’s Civil War

Sandra Pogodda, Htet Lynn Oo
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the 21st century, peacemaking is subject to a changing international order in which rising powers play a growing role. China’s mediation in Myanmar’s civil war is a case in point: since the international peace architecture has little access to the conflict. This paper contrasts divergent theoretical assumptions on the impact of multipolarity on peace processes with an in-depth examination of China’s strategy. For analysts of the emerging multipolar order, this research indicates that the optimistic assumptions of Mignolo’s pluriversal and Acharya’s multiplex theory might not be met by the rise of new actors in peacemaking. Instead, China’s mediation in Myanmar suggests that multipolarity favors geopolitics at the expense of emancipatory movements. China’s growing involvement in peace processes worldwide confirms recent scholarship on the lack of conflict resolution tools in the multipolar order, rendering multipolarity prone to instability and condemning emancipatory movements to permanent subjugation.

Asian international studies reviewVol. 26(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Chiang Mai University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.