The Future of Crisis Response Training: AI-Generated Feedback for Incident Commanders?

In today’s complex crisis landscape, effective incident command training relies on dynamic decision-making assessment frameworks. However, the Effective Command Behavioral Marker Framework (EC) momentarily demands a lot from human assessors, who must evaluate 72 criteria across a 5-point scale, leading to excessive cognitive load. This study explores whether AI-generated written feedback can support in the future assessors and possibly enhance learning outcomes by providing structured, data-driven insights of command training. We examine the assessment results from 85 incident commanders solutions to a virtual simulation ”School Fire” scenario. Key challenges brought out in the feedback included delayed decision-making, inter-agency coordination gaps, and situational awareness deficits. While expert feedback is valuable, the time constraints for compiling the written feedback create a discrepancy in the length and quality of the provided feedback. This study explores how AI can complement human assessor’s by reducing cognitive overload and enhancing incident command training through structured, data-driven feedback that supports assessors s expert judgment. Dynamic decision-making feedback systems using Human-AI collaboration may redefine training methodologies for next-generation incident commanders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59297/vfyshy09
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Crisis Response Training: AI-Generated Feedback for Incident Commanders?

Tambet Kütt, Reet Kasepalu, Stella Polikarpus, Daniel Jefimov
Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

The Future of Crisis Response Training: AI-Generated Feedback for Incident Commanders?

Tambet Kütt, Reet Kasepalu, Stella Polikarpus, Daniel Jefimov
article en

Abstract

In today’s complex crisis landscape, effective incident command training relies on dynamic decision-making assessment frameworks. However, the Effective Command Behavioral Marker Framework (EC) momentarily demands a lot from human assessors, who must evaluate 72 criteria across a 5-point scale, leading to excessive cognitive load. This study explores whether AI-generated written feedback can support in the future assessors and possibly enhance learning outcomes by providing structured, data-driven insights of command training. We examine the assessment results from 85 incident commanders solutions to a virtual simulation ”School Fire” scenario. Key challenges brought out in the feedback included delayed decision-making, inter-agency coordination gaps, and situational awareness deficits. While expert feedback is valuable, the time constraints for compiling the written feedback create a discrepancy in the length and quality of the provided feedback. This study explores how AI can complement human assessor’s by reducing cognitive overload and enhancing incident command training through structured, data-driven feedback that supports assessors s expert judgment. Dynamic decision-making feedback systems using Human-AI collaboration may redefine training methodologies for next-generation incident commanders.

Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Estonian Academy of Security Sciences (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.