Science-policy: UNFCCC policymakers’ perspective of scientific scenarios and their policy relevance

Abstract Scenarios play a pivotal role in linking climate science to policy action, informing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and international negotiations within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its annual Conferences of the Parties (COPs) 1–3 . However, policymakers’ (PMs) perspectives remain understudied. Here, we surveyed UNFCCC National Focal Points (N = 278/n = 57), assessing the knowledge base of international-national PMs, perceptions of scenarios’ policy relevance, and plausible improvements. Results highlight a significant regional knowledge gap, with lower scenario familiarity for PMs representing low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, policymakers request more straightforward scenario communication and more detail. To improve scenario relevance (credibility and legitimacy) 4 , we recommend more actively disseminating scenario knowledge (enhancing institutional capacity) in the Global South and providing more policy-relevant detail into global scenarios and national extensions (linking scenarios to on-the-ground policy action). This also means reassessing the IPCC’s cautiousness concerning being policy-neutral.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00250-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science-policy: UNFCCC policymakers’ perspective of scientific scenarios and their policy relevance

Rob Swart, Jiesper Strandsbjerg Tristan Pedersen, Filipe Duarte Santos, Joyeeta Gupta et al.
5 citations
npj Climate Action
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.66
article

Science-policy: UNFCCC policymakers’ perspective of scientific scenarios and their policy relevance

Rob Swart, Jiesper Strandsbjerg Tristan Pedersen, Filipe Duarte Santos, Joyeeta Gupta, Patrick O’Rourke, Carla Gomes, Detlef Peter van Vuuren
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Scenarios play a pivotal role in linking climate science to policy action, informing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and international negotiations within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its annual Conferences of the Parties (COPs) 1–3 . However, policymakers’ (PMs) perspectives remain understudied. Here, we surveyed UNFCCC National Focal Points (N = 278/n = 57), assessing the knowledge base of international-national PMs, perceptions of scenarios’ policy relevance, and plausible improvements. Results highlight a significant regional knowledge gap, with lower scenario familiarity for PMs representing low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, policymakers request more straightforward scenario communication and more detail. To improve scenario relevance (credibility and legitimacy) 4 , we recommend more actively disseminating scenario knowledge (enhancing institutional capacity) in the Global South and providing more policy-relevant detail into global scenarios and national extensions (linking scenarios to on-the-ground policy action). This also means reassessing the IPCC’s cautiousness concerning being policy-neutral.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Joint Global Change Research Institute (US), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), University of Lisbon (PT), Utrecht University (NL), IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL), Sustainability Institute (ZA), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Universidade da Madeira (PT), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.