Predicting tilling and seeding operation times in grain production: A comparison of machine learning and mechanistic models

• Examined nine models using different ML algorithms and two mechanistic models. • Dataset comprised 250 operations from 70 grain fields collected within 10 months. • All features derived from readily available operations data, no additional effort. • Random Forest model exhibited the highest accuracy (NRMSE=0.215; R2=0.910). • Operations data from tilling and seeding machinery enable cost-effective predictions. Field operations management in grain production requires accurate and timely predictions of operation times for machine tasks. While machine learning (ML) is being adopted more widely in operations management, little is known about its ability to predict tilling and seeding operation times. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prediction performance of ML models for these operation times by using readily available tractor and operations data rather than dynamic environmental data. We collected data between March 2022 and August 2023 from 70 grain fields in the southwest of Germany, including variables such as tractor speed, engine speed, fuel consumption, and field geometry. Operation times exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.88). Nine ML algorithms and two conventional mechanistic models proposed by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASAE EP496.3) were evaluated in a temporal external validation. Random forest (RF) models outperformed all other models, achieving a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.215 and a coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.910. Compared to a conventional mechanistic model, the RF model reduced the mean absolute error (MAE) by 37.8%, and enhanced the R 2 by 0.107. The study results highlight the potential of RF to predict tilling and seeding operation times in grain production without increasing the effort for data collection, offering an accessible and cost-effective solution for resource-constrained grain farming systems that experience data shortages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting tilling and seeding operation times in grain production: A comparison of machine learning and mechanistic models

Tobias Zimpel, Joerg Leukel, Luca Scheurer
1 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.75
article

Predicting tilling and seeding operation times in grain production: A comparison of machine learning and mechanistic models

Tobias Zimpel, Joerg Leukel, Luca Scheurer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Examined nine models using different ML algorithms and two mechanistic models. • Dataset comprised 250 operations from 70 grain fields collected within 10 months. • All features derived from readily available operations data, no additional effort. • Random Forest model exhibited the highest accuracy (NRMSE=0.215; R2=0.910). • Operations data from tilling and seeding machinery enable cost-effective predictions. Field operations management in grain production requires accurate and timely predictions of operation times for machine tasks. While machine learning (ML) is being adopted more widely in operations management, little is known about its ability to predict tilling and seeding operation times. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prediction performance of ML models for these operation times by using readily available tractor and operations data rather than dynamic environmental data. We collected data between March 2022 and August 2023 from 70 grain fields in the southwest of Germany, including variables such as tractor speed, engine speed, fuel consumption, and field geometry. Operation times exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.88). Nine ML algorithms and two conventional mechanistic models proposed by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASAE EP496.3) were evaluated in a temporal external validation. Random forest (RF) models outperformed all other models, achieving a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.215 and a coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.910. Compared to a conventional mechanistic model, the RF model reduced the mean absolute error (MAE) by 37.8%, and enhanced the R 2 by 0.107. The study results highlight the potential of RF to predict tilling and seeding operation times in grain production without increasing the effort for data collection, offering an accessible and cost-effective solution for resource-constrained grain farming systems that experience data shortages.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 11
University of Hohenheim (DE)
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.