The usefulness of orthopedic shoulder surgery randomized controlled trials: are they meeting the key criteria?

While transparency improvements have driven slight overall progress in trial quality, substantial gaps remain in key criteria like raw data availability and value for money. The findings highlight the need for journals and researchers to adopt comprehensive strategies to enhance the clinical impact of RCTs. This study underscores the value of structured assessment tools in identifying opportunities to optimize trial design and reporting, ultimately improving evidence-based care in orthopedic shoulder surgery. This study highlights persistent gaps in transparency among shoulder surgery RCTs and suggests that improved reporting, particularly regarding protocol and data availability, may enhance the overall usefulness and reliability of trial findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.04.015
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The usefulness of orthopedic shoulder surgery randomized controlled trials: are they meeting the key criteria?

Trevon Jelinek, Eli Paul, Cameron O’Brien, Matt Vassar et al.
4 citations
JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
8.03
article

The usefulness of orthopedic shoulder surgery randomized controlled trials: are they meeting the key criteria?

Trevon Jelinek, Eli Paul, Cameron O’Brien, Matt Vassar, Griffin Hughes, Chance Bratten, Alec Young
article en
4 citations

Abstract

While transparency improvements have driven slight overall progress in trial quality, substantial gaps remain in key criteria like raw data availability and value for money. The findings highlight the need for journals and researchers to adopt comprehensive strategies to enhance the clinical impact of RCTs. This study underscores the value of structured assessment tools in identifying opportunities to optimize trial design and reporting, ultimately improving evidence-based care in orthopedic shoulder surgery. This study highlights persistent gaps in transparency among shoulder surgery RCTs and suggests that improved reporting, particularly regarding protocol and data availability, may enhance the overall usefulness and reliability of trial findings.

JSES Reviews Reports and TechniquesVol. 5(4)
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
8.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.