Relationships between birth or calving seasons and first-lactation performance of Holstein cows in the Midwestern United States

The purpose of this study was to establish the effects of birth season on performance of first-lactation Holstein cows. Further analysis was conducted to determine if the impact of calving season was a more appropriate indicator. This study analyzed data from 2009 to 2022 and included 524 primiparous Holstein cows from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dairy Research Unit (Urbana, IL). Cows were managed per farm protocols. Seasons were assigned by birth and calving months: winter (December, January, February), spring (March, April, May), summer (June, July, August), and fall (September, October, November). The main comparison was winter versus summer seasons of birth and calving, but summer versus non-summer and winter versus non-winter were also used. Data were analyzed using the MIXED, UNIVARIATE, and MEANS procedures in SAS v. 9.4. Based on the first-lactation data, average test day milk yield (kg) for d 5 to 35 was less for summer-born cows in comparison to winter and non-summer-born cows. Average first test day fat and protein percentages were less for summer-born cows in contrast to winter. The length of pregnancy was less for summer-born cows compared with non-summer. The age at first calving (AFC) was lower for summer-born cows in comparison to winter and non-summer, whereas winter was greater than non-winter. No differences were observed for the number of times bred, number of lactations, or 305-d milk yield. Summer-calving cows tended to have less first test day milk yield (kg) compared with non-summer. First test day fat and protein percentages were lower for summer in comparison to winter and non-summer, whereas winter was greater than non-winter. Days pregnant were fewer for summer-calving cows relative to winter. Summer-calving cows stayed in the herd for fewer lactations than winter and non-summer, however winter-calving cows stayed for a greater number of lactations. Cows that calved in winter and summer tended to have lower AFC relative to non-winter and non-summer-calving cows, respectively. No differences were observed in times bred or 305-d milk yield. Overall, an association between birth and calving seasons was observed, suggesting their influence on first-lactation performance. Birth season data were more closely related to first test day milk yield and AFC, whereas calving season had a greater effect on first test day milk components and productive life, implying greater focus should be placed on calf husbandry and first-lactation cows calving during the warmest season in the Midwestern United States.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2025-0764
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships between birth or calving seasons and first-lactation performance of Holstein cows in the Midwestern United States

J.K. Drackley, K.N. Brost
JDS Communications
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

Relationships between birth or calving seasons and first-lactation performance of Holstein cows in the Midwestern United States

J.K. Drackley, K.N. Brost
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the effects of birth season on performance of first-lactation Holstein cows. Further analysis was conducted to determine if the impact of calving season was a more appropriate indicator. This study analyzed data from 2009 to 2022 and included 524 primiparous Holstein cows from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dairy Research Unit (Urbana, IL). Cows were managed per farm protocols. Seasons were assigned by birth and calving months: winter (December, January, February), spring (March, April, May), summer (June, July, August), and fall (September, October, November). The main comparison was winter versus summer seasons of birth and calving, but summer versus non-summer and winter versus non-winter were also used. Data were analyzed using the MIXED, UNIVARIATE, and MEANS procedures in SAS v. 9.4. Based on the first-lactation data, average test day milk yield (kg) for d 5 to 35 was less for summer-born cows in comparison to winter and non-summer-born cows. Average first test day fat and protein percentages were less for summer-born cows in contrast to winter. The length of pregnancy was less for summer-born cows compared with non-summer. The age at first calving (AFC) was lower for summer-born cows in comparison to winter and non-summer, whereas winter was greater than non-winter. No differences were observed for the number of times bred, number of lactations, or 305-d milk yield. Summer-calving cows tended to have less first test day milk yield (kg) compared with non-summer. First test day fat and protein percentages were lower for summer in comparison to winter and non-summer, whereas winter was greater than non-winter. Days pregnant were fewer for summer-calving cows relative to winter. Summer-calving cows stayed in the herd for fewer lactations than winter and non-summer, however winter-calving cows stayed for a greater number of lactations. Cows that calved in winter and summer tended to have lower AFC relative to non-winter and non-summer-calving cows, respectively. No differences were observed in times bred or 305-d milk yield. Overall, an association between birth and calving seasons was observed, suggesting their influence on first-lactation performance. Birth season data were more closely related to first test day milk yield and AFC, whereas calving season had a greater effect on first test day milk components and productive life, implying greater focus should be placed on calf husbandry and first-lactation cows calving during the warmest season in the Midwestern United States.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(5)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Urbana University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.