Half of the habitat of Australia's highly imperilled narrow-range species is outside protected areas

Globally, species with small distributions face disproportionate extinction risk, with the impacts of land use change more likely to have catastrophic consequences. Identifying, protecting and managing sites where such species occur is essential for minimising their extinction risk. Yet across Australia, efforts to protect and manage such species' habitats have hitherto been insufficient. Here, we present an example of an analytical and interpretive pathway for the conservation of such species, for a continental-scale case study. We identified 305 Critically Endangered species that have narrow ranges (<20,000 km 2 ), and are distributed in fewer than six discrete patches. We refined existing species' habitat maps with advice from 18 experts via a modified Delphi approach. We assessed how much of each species' habitat is outside protected areas and considered to have agricultural capability, potentially elevating risk of conversion. We identified ∼85,000 km 2 of habitat (∼1% of Australia) for these 305 species that must receive protection and management if the nation is going to meet its commitment to halt new extinctions. Approximately half of this habitat is outside the protected area estate, including the entire distribution of 39 species. Approximately 55% of habitat outside of protected areas had at least some agricultural capability. Protecting and managing the habitats of these narrow-range species should be a high priority in state and national conservation policy. Our case study serves as a template for the identification of important habitat for threatened species and could be applied in other regions of the world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111195
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Half of the habitat of Australia's highly imperilled narrow-range species is outside protected areas

James E. M. Watson, Jeremy S. Simmonds, John C. Z. Woinarski, Arthur Georges et al.
7 citations
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
12.01
article

Half of the habitat of Australia's highly imperilled narrow-range species is outside protected areas

James E. M. Watson, Jeremy S. Simmonds, John C. Z. Woinarski, Arthur Georges, Michelle Ward, JAMES A. FITZSIMONS, Romola Stewart, Sarah Legge, Mark Lintermans, Ayesha Tulloch, Martine Maron, Nick S. Whiterod, David G. Chapple, Rachael V. Gallagher, Hugh Philip Possingham, Stephen Thomas Garnett, Brendan A. Wintle, Vanessa M. Adams, Kate Pearce, Kita Ashman, Gerald Kuchling, Conrad J. Hoskin, Samantha Vine, Matthew West, Tarmo A. Raadik, Isabel T. Hyman, Allan H. Burbidge, Ben C. Scheele, J. P. Emery, Cerin Loane
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Globally, species with small distributions face disproportionate extinction risk, with the impacts of land use change more likely to have catastrophic consequences. Identifying, protecting and managing sites where such species occur is essential for minimising their extinction risk. Yet across Australia, efforts to protect and manage such species' habitats have hitherto been insufficient. Here, we present an example of an analytical and interpretive pathway for the conservation of such species, for a continental-scale case study. We identified 305 Critically Endangered species that have narrow ranges (<20,000 km 2 ), and are distributed in fewer than six discrete patches. We refined existing species' habitat maps with advice from 18 experts via a modified Delphi approach. We assessed how much of each species' habitat is outside protected areas and considered to have agricultural capability, potentially elevating risk of conversion. We identified ∼85,000 km 2 of habitat (∼1% of Australia) for these 305 species that must receive protection and management if the nation is going to meet its commitment to halt new extinctions. Approximately half of this habitat is outside the protected area estate, including the entire distribution of 39 species. Approximately 55% of habitat outside of protected areas had at least some agricultural capability. Protecting and managing the habitats of these narrow-range species should be a high priority in state and national conservation policy. Our case study serves as a template for the identification of important habitat for threatened species and could be applied in other regions of the world.

Biological ConservationVol. 308
Griffith University (AU), Australian National University (AU), The Nature Conservancy (US), University of Tasmania (AU), Deakin University (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (AU), BirdLife Australia (AU), Queensland Government (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Goyder Institute for Water Research (AU), Water Research Australia (AU), Sydney Fish Market (Australia) (AU), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Monash University (AU), Western Sydney University (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
12.01
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.