An innovative construction technique in Roman theatres: The structural analysis of the cavea substructure in the theatres of Augusta Raurica (Augst) and Aventicum (Avenches)

Ancient Roman engineers used different methods when building the substructure of the seating area ( cavea ) of theatres and amphitheatres. In the northwestern provinces of the Empire, they often supported the seats by an artificial earth embankment which posed the structural problem of containing the soil infill. Because the curved perimeter wall of the cavea was not able to withstand the lateral earth pressure on its own, Roman engineers started experimenting with reinforcement systems which led to a variety of different cavea substructures. One of the most innovative and intriguing solutions to this problem can be seen in the theatre of Augusta Raurica (present-day Augst, Switzerland) where the retaining walls of the theatre were reinforced by series of semicircular buttresses. In the almost identical theatre of Aventicum (Avenches, Switzerland) the more traditional solution of a system of radial and annular walls were used for the same purpose. To get a better understanding of the structural behaviour of the theatre in Augst, the cavea substructure of both the theatres of Augst and Avenches were analysed with finite element method (FEM). Contrasting the structural properties and the amount of building material needed for each of the two theatres shed light on some of the reasons why the unconventional solution utilized in Augst did not become common. Although it used less building material, it was not as robust as the structural solution used in Avenches. Also, the support for the long, rectangular limestone blocks of the seating were not sufficient in Augst and the seats might have been subject to a considerable uneven sinking as the earth infill under them consolidated and shrank. • Different building methods for supporting the seating area ( cavea ) of Roman theatres are investigated. • Two versions where the cavea was built on an artificial embankment are contrasted. • An innovative method where the retaining walls of the theatre were reinforced with semicircular buttresses is explored. • The structural analysis of the Roman theatres of Augst and Avenches is conducted using finite element method (FEM). • Calculations suggest that the structure with semicircular buttresses used less building material but was less robust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106273
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An innovative construction technique in Roman theatres: The structural analysis of the cavea substructure in the theatres of Augusta Raurica (Augst) and Aventicum (Avenches)

Dezső Hegyi, Linda Dobosi
Journal of Archaeological Science
Building materials and conservation
article

An innovative construction technique in Roman theatres: The structural analysis of the cavea substructure in the theatres of Augusta Raurica (Augst) and Aventicum (Avenches)

Dezső Hegyi, Linda Dobosi
article en

Abstract

Ancient Roman engineers used different methods when building the substructure of the seating area ( cavea ) of theatres and amphitheatres. In the northwestern provinces of the Empire, they often supported the seats by an artificial earth embankment which posed the structural problem of containing the soil infill. Because the curved perimeter wall of the cavea was not able to withstand the lateral earth pressure on its own, Roman engineers started experimenting with reinforcement systems which led to a variety of different cavea substructures. One of the most innovative and intriguing solutions to this problem can be seen in the theatre of Augusta Raurica (present-day Augst, Switzerland) where the retaining walls of the theatre were reinforced by series of semicircular buttresses. In the almost identical theatre of Aventicum (Avenches, Switzerland) the more traditional solution of a system of radial and annular walls were used for the same purpose. To get a better understanding of the structural behaviour of the theatre in Augst, the cavea substructure of both the theatres of Augst and Avenches were analysed with finite element method (FEM). Contrasting the structural properties and the amount of building material needed for each of the two theatres shed light on some of the reasons why the unconventional solution utilized in Augst did not become common. Although it used less building material, it was not as robust as the structural solution used in Avenches. Also, the support for the long, rectangular limestone blocks of the seating were not sufficient in Augst and the seats might have been subject to a considerable uneven sinking as the earth infill under them consolidated and shrank. • Different building methods for supporting the seating area ( cavea ) of Roman theatres are investigated. • Two versions where the cavea was built on an artificial embankment are contrasted. • An innovative method where the retaining walls of the theatre were reinforced with semicircular buttresses is explored. • The structural analysis of the Roman theatres of Augst and Avenches is conducted using finite element method (FEM). • Calculations suggest that the structure with semicircular buttresses used less building material but was less robust.

Journal of Archaeological ScienceVol. 180
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Building materials and conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.