Can We Trust Open Government Data in Public Procurement?

Evidence-based policy-making in public procurement depends on high-quality data. This case study evaluates 14 months (Nov 2023–Jan 2025) of procurement records from the EU’s Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) to assess the reliability of this key data source. Our analysis uncovers significant anomalies in data accuracy and governance, raising concerns about the integrity of procurement processes and the policies built on them. We highlight the urgent need for improved data governance to support transparency, accountability, and innovation-driven procurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conference on Digital Government Research
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1019
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can We Trust Open Government Data in Public Procurement?

Marc Wyszynski, Gerhard Klassen, Björn Niehaves, J. C. Westermann et al.
Conference on Digital Government Research
E-Government and Public Services
article

Can We Trust Open Government Data in Public Procurement?

Marc Wyszynski, Gerhard Klassen, Björn Niehaves, J. C. Westermann, Robin Fritzsche
article en

Abstract

Evidence-based policy-making in public procurement depends on high-quality data. This case study evaluates 14 months (Nov 2023–Jan 2025) of procurement records from the EU’s Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) to assess the reliability of this key data source. Our analysis uncovers significant anomalies in data accuracy and governance, raising concerns about the integrity of procurement processes and the policies built on them. We highlight the urgent need for improved data governance to support transparency, accountability, and innovation-driven procurement.

Conference on Digital Government ResearchVol. 1
University of Bremen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.