Converging Paths?

This study investigates how co-creation is being institutionalized in public service delivery in Poland and Ukraine, focusing on six domains of citizen involvement: legislative frameworks, digital platforms, public consultations, civic monitoring, local initiatives, and civic education. These neighboring countries, connected through shared regional initiatives but shaped by differing political, administrative, and civic trajectories, offer a compelling basis for comparative analysis. While both have made strides in adopting participatory practices, Poland tends to follow a more structured, policy-aligned approach, whereas Ukraine exhibits dynamic, bottom-up developments driven by ongoing decentralization reforms. Our findings indicate that co-creation is becoming more systematically integrated into governance structures, although institutionalization remains uneven across domains and administrative levels. Key challenges include institutional fragmentation, limited translation of public input into policy outcomes, and underdeveloped interdisciplinary competencies, particularly in light of digital transformation and the growing role of AI. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for strengthening co-creation ecosystems in both countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conference on Digital Government Research
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1017
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Converging Paths?

Nina Rizun, Nina Khairova, Yuliia Bartashevska, Hanna Bondarovych
Conference on Digital Government Research
E-Government and Public Services
article

Converging Paths?

Nina Rizun, Nina Khairova, Yuliia Bartashevska, Hanna Bondarovych
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how co-creation is being institutionalized in public service delivery in Poland and Ukraine, focusing on six domains of citizen involvement: legislative frameworks, digital platforms, public consultations, civic monitoring, local initiatives, and civic education. These neighboring countries, connected through shared regional initiatives but shaped by differing political, administrative, and civic trajectories, offer a compelling basis for comparative analysis. While both have made strides in adopting participatory practices, Poland tends to follow a more structured, policy-aligned approach, whereas Ukraine exhibits dynamic, bottom-up developments driven by ongoing decentralization reforms. Our findings indicate that co-creation is becoming more systematically integrated into governance structures, although institutionalization remains uneven across domains and administrative levels. Key challenges include institutional fragmentation, limited translation of public input into policy outcomes, and underdeveloped interdisciplinary competencies, particularly in light of digital transformation and the growing role of AI. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for strengthening co-creation ecosystems in both countries.

Conference on Digital Government ResearchVol. 1
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), Alfred Nobel University (UA), Umeå University (SE)
European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, Erasmus+
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Converging Paths? — Nina Rizun, Nina Khairova, et al. · Conference on Digital Government Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS