Supine and Prone Positions in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Exploring Their Roles in Operative Efficiency and Patient Comfort

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of supine and prone positions during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on operative characteristics, patient out-comes and postoperative quality of recovery. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 patients who underwent PCNL for renal stones ≥2 cm at a single center between December 2022 and August 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 41 treated in the mini-PCNL (mPCNL) supine position and 37 in the standart PCNL (sPCNL) prone position. Demographic data, operative time, hospital stay duration, complication rates, postoperative pain and analgesic requirements and quality of recovery scores (QoR) were compared. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on residual stone presence at 2 months postoperatively, with

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1597277
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supine and Prone Positions in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Exploring Their Roles in Operative Efficiency and Patient Comfort

Emre Ediz, Ahmet Yıldırım Balık, Ekrem Başaran, Muhammet Ali Kayıkçı et al.
1 citations
Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
1.52
article

Supine and Prone Positions in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Exploring Their Roles in Operative Efficiency and Patient Comfort

Emre Ediz, Ahmet Yıldırım Balık, Ekrem Başaran, Muhammet Ali Kayıkçı, Yusuf Şenoğlu, Dursun Baba, Arda Taşkın Taşkıran, İsmail Eyüp Dilek, Burak Ayvacık
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of supine and prone positions during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on operative characteristics, patient out-comes and postoperative quality of recovery. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 patients who underwent PCNL for renal stones ≥2 cm at a single center between December 2022 and August 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 41 treated in the mini-PCNL (mPCNL) supine position and 37 in the standart PCNL (sPCNL) prone position. Demographic data, operative time, hospital stay duration, complication rates, postoperative pain and analgesic requirements and quality of recovery scores (QoR) were compared. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on residual stone presence at 2 months postoperatively, with

Sağlık Bilimlerinde DeğerVol. 15(2)
Düzce Üniversitesi (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.