Wind of change: shifting narratives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Duisburg and Germany

Abstract Global networks of megaprojects like China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) face growing geopolitical challenges that shape their success or failure. This paper investigates how the BRI’s symbolic value has transitioned from economic hope to strategic concern, driven by evolving geoeconomic and geopolitical narratives. Focusing on Duisburg and Germany the study employs the frameworks of symbolic economy and symbolic policy to unravel the complex, multi-scalar interactions within these intertwined netscapes. The findings reveal that traditional success and failure metrics, typically centred on economic and operational outcomes, are insufficient. Instead, the study underscores the importance of symbolic factors (e.g. image creation, the alignment with broader political/economic agendas) in determining the long-term viability and perception of megaprojects in an evolving geopolitical landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaf006
Citations
2
Primary Topic
China's Global Influence and Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wind of change: shifting narratives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Duisburg and Germany

Nicholas A. Phelps, Franziska Sielker, Peter Dannenberg, Johanna Fellbrich
2 citations
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
China's Global Influence and Migration
22.69
article

Wind of change: shifting narratives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Duisburg and Germany

Nicholas A. Phelps, Franziska Sielker, Peter Dannenberg, Johanna Fellbrich
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Global networks of megaprojects like China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) face growing geopolitical challenges that shape their success or failure. This paper investigates how the BRI’s symbolic value has transitioned from economic hope to strategic concern, driven by evolving geoeconomic and geopolitical narratives. Focusing on Duisburg and Germany the study employs the frameworks of symbolic economy and symbolic policy to unravel the complex, multi-scalar interactions within these intertwined netscapes. The findings reveal that traditional success and failure metrics, typically centred on economic and operational outcomes, are insufficient. Instead, the study underscores the importance of symbolic factors (e.g. image creation, the alignment with broader political/economic agendas) in determining the long-term viability and perception of megaprojects in an evolving geopolitical landscape.

Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and SocietyVol. 18(2)
TU Wien (AT), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Cologne (DE), Institute for Urban and Regional Research (AT), Faculty of Design (SI), Institute of Geography of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Technische Universität Wien, Universität zu Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Global Influence and Migration
22.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.