European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

Spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) affects ~3.4 million people worldwide each year, causing ~2.8 million deaths. Many randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies have added to the evidence base for the management of people with ICH since the last European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous ICH were published in 2014, so we updated the ESO guideline. This guideline update was guided by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedures for guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, in collaboration with the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). We identified 37 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions and prioritised clinical outcomes. We conducted systematic literature searches, tailored to each PICO, seeking randomised controlled trials (RCT) - or observational studies when RCTs were not appropriate, or not available - that investigated interventions to improve clinical outcomes. A group of co-authors allocated to each PICO screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data from included studies. A methodologist conducted study-level meta-analyses and created summaries of findings tables. The same group of co-authors graded the quality of evidence, and drafted recommendations that were reviewed, revised and approved by the entire group. When there was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, each group of co-authors drafted an expert consensus statement, which was reviewed, revised and voted on by the entire group. The systematic literature search revealed 115,647 articles. We included 208 studies. We found <b>strong evidence for</b> treatment of people with ICH on organised stroke units, and secondary prevention of stroke with blood pressure lowering. We found <b>weak evidence for</b> scores for predicting macrovascular causes underlying ICH; acute blood pressure lowering; open surgery via craniotomy for supratentorial ICH; minimally invasive surgery for supratentorial ICH; decompressive surgery for deep supratentorial ICH; evacuation of cerebellar ICH > 15 mL; external ventricular drainage with intraventricular thrombolysis for intraventricular extension; minimally invasive surgical evacuation of intraventricular blood; intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent proximal deep vein thrombosis; antiplatelet therapy for a licensed indication for secondary prevention; and applying a care bundle. We found <b>strong evidence against</b> anti-inflammatory drug use outside of clinical trials. We found <b>weak evidence against</b> routine use of rFVIIa, platelet transfusions for antiplatelet-associated ICH, general policies that limit treatment within 24 h of ICH onset, temperature and glucose management as single measures (outside of care bundles), prophylactic anti-seizures medicines, and prophylactic use of temperature-lowering measures, prokinetic anti-emetics, and/or antibiotics. New evidence about the management of ICH has emerged since 2014, enabling this update of the ESO guideline to provide new recommendations and consensus statements. Although we made strong recommendations for and against a few interventions, we were only able to make weak recommendations for and against many others, or produce consensus statements where the evidence was insufficient to guide clinical decisions. Although progress has been made, many interventions still require definitive, high-quality evidence, underpinning the need for embedding clinical trials in routine clinical practice for ICH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251340815
Citations
44
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
61.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

Stefan T. Gerner, Trine Apostolaki‐Hansson, Floris H.B.M. Schreuder, Jan Purrucker et al.
44 citations
European Stroke Journal
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
61.13
article

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

Stefan T. Gerner, Trine Apostolaki‐Hansson, Floris H.B.M. Schreuder, Jan Purrucker, Else Charlotte Sandset, Hanne Christensen, Andreas Raabe, Rustam Al‐Shahi Salman, Matthew B. Downer, Silje Holt Jahr, Helle Eilertsen, Thorsten Steiner, Catharina J.M. Klijn, Jürgen Beck, Leonard Ho, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Charlotte Cordonnier, David Julian Seiffge, Jessica Petersson, Nicolas Martinez‐Majander, Kateriine Orav, Rachael Gartly
article en
44 citations

Abstract

Spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) affects ~3.4 million people worldwide each year, causing ~2.8 million deaths. Many randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies have added to the evidence base for the management of people with ICH since the last European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous ICH were published in 2014, so we updated the ESO guideline. This guideline update was guided by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedures for guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, in collaboration with the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). We identified 37 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions and prioritised clinical outcomes. We conducted systematic literature searches, tailored to each PICO, seeking randomised controlled trials (RCT) - or observational studies when RCTs were not appropriate, or not available - that investigated interventions to improve clinical outcomes. A group of co-authors allocated to each PICO screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data from included studies. A methodologist conducted study-level meta-analyses and created summaries of findings tables. The same group of co-authors graded the quality of evidence, and drafted recommendations that were reviewed, revised and approved by the entire group. When there was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, each group of co-authors drafted an expert consensus statement, which was reviewed, revised and voted on by the entire group. The systematic literature search revealed 115,647 articles. We included 208 studies. We found <b>strong evidence for</b> treatment of people with ICH on organised stroke units, and secondary prevention of stroke with blood pressure lowering. We found <b>weak evidence for</b> scores for predicting macrovascular causes underlying ICH; acute blood pressure lowering; open surgery via craniotomy for supratentorial ICH; minimally invasive surgery for supratentorial ICH; decompressive surgery for deep supratentorial ICH; evacuation of cerebellar ICH > 15 mL; external ventricular drainage with intraventricular thrombolysis for intraventricular extension; minimally invasive surgical evacuation of intraventricular blood; intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent proximal deep vein thrombosis; antiplatelet therapy for a licensed indication for secondary prevention; and applying a care bundle. We found <b>strong evidence against</b> anti-inflammatory drug use outside of clinical trials. We found <b>weak evidence against</b> routine use of rFVIIa, platelet transfusions for antiplatelet-associated ICH, general policies that limit treatment within 24 h of ICH onset, temperature and glucose management as single measures (outside of care bundles), prophylactic anti-seizures medicines, and prophylactic use of temperature-lowering measures, prokinetic anti-emetics, and/or antibiotics. New evidence about the management of ICH has emerged since 2014, enabling this update of the ESO guideline to provide new recommendations and consensus statements. Although we made strong recommendations for and against a few interventions, we were only able to make weak recommendations for and against many others, or produce consensus statements where the evidence was insufficient to guide clinical decisions. Although progress has been made, many interventions still require definitive, high-quality evidence, underpinning the need for embedding clinical trials in routine clinical practice for ICH.

European Stroke JournalVol. 10(4)
University of Bern (CH), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Lisbon (PT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), University of Freiburg (DE), University of Oslo (NO), Lund University (SE), Heidelberg University (DE), Université de Lille (FR), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), University Hospital of Bern (CH), European CanCer Organisation (BE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Edinburgh College (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), North Estonia Medical Centre (EE), Hospital de São José (PT), MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine (GB), Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst (DE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), European Stroke Organisation (CH), Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (FI), Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (PT), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
61.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.