EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT DRIVES AND TRANSMISSIONS

Based on the results of tests conducted by the independent Swedish research institute Rototest, this study provides a comprehensive statistical assessment of torque losses in automobile transmissions of various types and configurations. The analysis relies on an extensive dataset comprising over 600 vehicles produced between 1993 and 2010, including cars with manual and automatic transmissions and different types of drivetrain layouts (FWD, RWD, AWD). Measurements were obtained using hub-mounted dynamometers, which allow for direct torque evaluation at the wheel hubs and eliminate typical errors associated with traditional chassis dynamometers, such as tire slippage and rolling radius uncertainties. The results show a noticeable difference in transmission efficiency depending on transmission type and production year. For mechanical transmissions, the average efficiency before 2004 is estimated at approximately 0.91, whereas for vehicles produced after 2005 it reaches up to 0.96—suggesting significant advancements in design precision, materials, and lubrication systems. Automatic transmissions, on the other hand, exhibit relatively stable efficiency levels around 0.89, with losses generally higher than in manual systems, regardless of drive layout. The study also explores the modal and average values of power losses across different configurations, highlighting that front- and rear-wheel-drive vehicles with manual gearboxes exhibit lower losses compared to their automatic counterparts. Despite ongoing development in automatic systems, such as torque converter lock-up mechanisms and multi-speed designs, their efficiency gains remain limited in practice. These findings emphasize the importance of statistically grounded, independent testing for evaluating drivetrain performance and provide valuable insights for manufacturers, engineers, and policymakers focused on improving vehicle energy efficiency. Key words: transmission, car, manual transmission, automatic transmission, wheel, front wheel drive, rear wheel drive, full wheel drive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
СУЧАСНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ В МАШИНОБУДУВАННІ ТА ТРАНСПОРТІ
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36910/automash.v1i24.1714
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT DRIVES AND TRANSMISSIONS

Юрій ЗИБЦЕВ, Павло ВОРОШИЛОВ
СУЧАСНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ В МАШИНОБУДУВАННІ ТА ТРАНСПОРТІ
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
article

EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT DRIVES AND TRANSMISSIONS

Юрій ЗИБЦЕВ, Павло ВОРОШИЛОВ
article en

Abstract

Based on the results of tests conducted by the independent Swedish research institute Rototest, this study provides a comprehensive statistical assessment of torque losses in automobile transmissions of various types and configurations. The analysis relies on an extensive dataset comprising over 600 vehicles produced between 1993 and 2010, including cars with manual and automatic transmissions and different types of drivetrain layouts (FWD, RWD, AWD). Measurements were obtained using hub-mounted dynamometers, which allow for direct torque evaluation at the wheel hubs and eliminate typical errors associated with traditional chassis dynamometers, such as tire slippage and rolling radius uncertainties. The results show a noticeable difference in transmission efficiency depending on transmission type and production year. For mechanical transmissions, the average efficiency before 2004 is estimated at approximately 0.91, whereas for vehicles produced after 2005 it reaches up to 0.96—suggesting significant advancements in design precision, materials, and lubrication systems. Automatic transmissions, on the other hand, exhibit relatively stable efficiency levels around 0.89, with losses generally higher than in manual systems, regardless of drive layout. The study also explores the modal and average values of power losses across different configurations, highlighting that front- and rear-wheel-drive vehicles with manual gearboxes exhibit lower losses compared to their automatic counterparts. Despite ongoing development in automatic systems, such as torque converter lock-up mechanisms and multi-speed designs, their efficiency gains remain limited in practice. These findings emphasize the importance of statistically grounded, independent testing for evaluating drivetrain performance and provide valuable insights for manufacturers, engineers, and policymakers focused on improving vehicle energy efficiency. Key words: transmission, car, manual transmission, automatic transmission, wheel, front wheel drive, rear wheel drive, full wheel drive.

СУЧАСНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ В МАШИНОБУДУВАННІ ТА ТРАНСПОРТІVol. 1(24)
Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.