Unconscious stereotypes: An investigation into public attitudes toward disabled groups

IRAP1 directly supports the theory of intergroup contact, whereas IRAP2 provides indirect support for the theory of intergroup discrimination and ingroup favoritism. The public holds both positive and negative implicit stereotypes towards these two groups of disabilities. This study expands the application of IRAP, uncovers the public's complex implicit stereotypes, and enhances two theories closely related to the people with disabilities. It is crucial for understanding these implicit stereotypes and for mitigating and alleviating negative implicit stereotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02850-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unconscious stereotypes: An investigation into public attitudes toward disabled groups

Sun Shan, Xiuya Lei, Yuxin Fan, Yang Yang et al.
1 citations
BMC Psychology
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
4.20
article

Unconscious stereotypes: An investigation into public attitudes toward disabled groups

Sun Shan, Xiuya Lei, Yuxin Fan, Yang Yang, Liyan Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IRAP1 directly supports the theory of intergroup contact, whereas IRAP2 provides indirect support for the theory of intergroup discrimination and ingroup favoritism. The public holds both positive and negative implicit stereotypes towards these two groups of disabilities. This study expands the application of IRAP, uncovers the public's complex implicit stereotypes, and enhances two theories closely related to the people with disabilities. It is crucial for understanding these implicit stereotypes and for mitigating and alleviating negative implicit stereotypes.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Beijing Forestry University, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.