Selecting the best habitat mapping technique: a comparative assessment for fisheries management in Exmouth Gulf

A spatially explicit understanding of marine benthic habitats is essential for sustainable marine resource management. While advances in remote sensing, acoustic methodologies, geostatistical modelling, and predictive species distribution models have improved our ability to map underwater habitats, selecting the most appropriate approach, particularly in turbid or remote regions, remains challenging. This study was conducted in the protected nursery area of the Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery in Western Australia and compared four commonly used “off-the-shelf” mapping techniques. These included satellite remote sensing, acoustic sounding, predictive modelling, and geostatistical interpolation, with each technique evaluated using comprehensive ground-truthing and output confidence matrices. Geostatistical kriging emerged as the most robust method, delivering the highest predictive accuracy, quantifiable confidence, and spatially explicit seasonal habitat maps. These maps delineated submerged aquatic vegetation, including seagrass and macroalgae, at broad spatial scales and captured seasonal shifts in habitat distribution and density. Our findings enhance knowledge of benthic habitats in Exmouth Gulf and underscore that effective marine habitat mapping, particularly in dynamic and turbid environments, cannot rely on remote methods alone. Spatially balanced field data collection at ecologically relevant temporal scales is essential to support sustainable marine resource management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1570277
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting the best habitat mapping technique: a comparative assessment for fisheries management in Exmouth Gulf

Nick Konzewitsch, Renae K. Hovey, Gary A. Kendrick, Scott N. Evans et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Marine Science
Marine and fisheries research
3.32
article

Selecting the best habitat mapping technique: a comparative assessment for fisheries management in Exmouth Gulf

Nick Konzewitsch, Renae K. Hovey, Gary A. Kendrick, Scott N. Evans, Lynda M. Bellchambers
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A spatially explicit understanding of marine benthic habitats is essential for sustainable marine resource management. While advances in remote sensing, acoustic methodologies, geostatistical modelling, and predictive species distribution models have improved our ability to map underwater habitats, selecting the most appropriate approach, particularly in turbid or remote regions, remains challenging. This study was conducted in the protected nursery area of the Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery in Western Australia and compared four commonly used “off-the-shelf” mapping techniques. These included satellite remote sensing, acoustic sounding, predictive modelling, and geostatistical interpolation, with each technique evaluated using comprehensive ground-truthing and output confidence matrices. Geostatistical kriging emerged as the most robust method, delivering the highest predictive accuracy, quantifiable confidence, and spatially explicit seasonal habitat maps. These maps delineated submerged aquatic vegetation, including seagrass and macroalgae, at broad spatial scales and captured seasonal shifts in habitat distribution and density. Our findings enhance knowledge of benthic habitats in Exmouth Gulf and underscore that effective marine habitat mapping, particularly in dynamic and turbid environments, cannot rely on remote methods alone. Spatially balanced field data collection at ecologically relevant temporal scales is essential to support sustainable marine resource management.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
The University of Western Australia (AU), Government of Western Australia (AU)
Australian Government, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Marine and fisheries research
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.