Methodological foundations for <scp>artificial intelligence</scp>‐driven survey question generation

Abstract Background This study investigates the use of large language models to create adaptive, contextually relevant survey questions, aiming to enhance data quality in educational research without limiting scalability. Purpose We provide step‐by‐step methods to develop a dynamic survey instrument, driven by artificial intelligence (AI), and introduce the Synthetic Question–Response Analysis (SQRA) framework, a methodology designed to help evaluate AI‐generated questions before deployment with human participants. Design We examine the questions generated by our survey instrument, as well as compare AI‐to‐AI, generated through our SQRA framework, with AI‐to‐human interactions. Activity theory provides a theoretical lens to examine the dynamic interactions between AI and participants, highlighting the mutual influence within the survey tool. Results We found that AI‐generated questions were contextually relevant and adaptable, successfully incorporating course‐specific references. However, issues such as redundant phrasing, double‐barreled questions, and jargon affected the clarity of the questions. Although the SQRA framework exhibited limitations in replicating human response variability, its iterative refinement process proved effective in improving question quality, reinforcing the utility of this approach for enhancing AI‐driven surveys. Conclusions While AI‐driven question generation can enhance the scalability and personalization of open‐ended survey prompts, more research is needed to establish best practices for high‐quality educational research. The SQRA framework demonstrated practical utility for prompt refinement and initial validation of AI‐generated survey content, but it is not capable of replicating human responses. We highlight the importance of iterative prompt engineering, ethical considerations, and the need for methodological advancements in the development of trustworthy AI‐driven survey instruments for educational research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70012
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological foundations for artificial intelligence‐driven survey question generation

Alexandra Werth, Campbell J. McColley, Ted Mburu, Kangxuan Rong
3 citations
Journal of Engineering Education
Expert finding and Q&A systems
9.74
article

Methodological foundations for artificial intelligence‐driven survey question generation

Alexandra Werth, Campbell J. McColley, Ted Mburu, Kangxuan Rong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background This study investigates the use of large language models to create adaptive, contextually relevant survey questions, aiming to enhance data quality in educational research without limiting scalability. Purpose We provide step‐by‐step methods to develop a dynamic survey instrument, driven by artificial intelligence (AI), and introduce the Synthetic Question–Response Analysis (SQRA) framework, a methodology designed to help evaluate AI‐generated questions before deployment with human participants. Design We examine the questions generated by our survey instrument, as well as compare AI‐to‐AI, generated through our SQRA framework, with AI‐to‐human interactions. Activity theory provides a theoretical lens to examine the dynamic interactions between AI and participants, highlighting the mutual influence within the survey tool. Results We found that AI‐generated questions were contextually relevant and adaptable, successfully incorporating course‐specific references. However, issues such as redundant phrasing, double‐barreled questions, and jargon affected the clarity of the questions. Although the SQRA framework exhibited limitations in replicating human response variability, its iterative refinement process proved effective in improving question quality, reinforcing the utility of this approach for enhancing AI‐driven surveys. Conclusions While AI‐driven question generation can enhance the scalability and personalization of open‐ended survey prompts, more research is needed to establish best practices for high‐quality educational research. The SQRA framework demonstrated practical utility for prompt refinement and initial validation of AI‐generated survey content, but it is not capable of replicating human responses. We highlight the importance of iterative prompt engineering, ethical considerations, and the need for methodological advancements in the development of trustworthy AI‐driven survey instruments for educational research.

Journal of Engineering EducationVol. 114(3)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), Cornell University (US)
Cornell University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.