On the Relative Contributions of National and Regional Institutions to Economic Development

ABSTRACT Institutional quality is recognized as a fundamental driver of long‐run growth (Acemoglu et al. 2005) and it has been widely studied at both country and regional levels in the economic growth literature. Nevertheless, the literature is scant on the question of how this relationship behaves when the hierarchical structure of regions and countries is considered. To fill this gap, we propose a novel approach to the question, relying on multilevel econometric techniques. We empirically analyze how much of the effect shown by institutional quality on regional economic development can be attributed to the quality of national institutions. We argue that ignoring the multilevel structure may lead to over‐weighting the real influence of regional institutional quality and, conversely, under‐weighting (or directly overlooking) the effect of the country's institutional quality on regional economic development. We present empirical evidence that the national institutional level outweighs the possible effect of lower government tiers have on a region's economic development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regional Science
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12776
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Relative Contributions of National and Regional Institutions to Economic Development

Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, María Teresa Balaguer-Coll, Daniel Aparicio‐Pérez, Jesús Peiró‐Palomino
Journal of Regional Science
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

On the Relative Contributions of National and Regional Institutions to Economic Development

Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, María Teresa Balaguer-Coll, Daniel Aparicio‐Pérez, Jesús Peiró‐Palomino
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Institutional quality is recognized as a fundamental driver of long‐run growth (Acemoglu et al. 2005) and it has been widely studied at both country and regional levels in the economic growth literature. Nevertheless, the literature is scant on the question of how this relationship behaves when the hierarchical structure of regions and countries is considered. To fill this gap, we propose a novel approach to the question, relying on multilevel econometric techniques. We empirically analyze how much of the effect shown by institutional quality on regional economic development can be attributed to the quality of national institutions. We argue that ignoring the multilevel structure may lead to over‐weighting the real influence of regional institutional quality and, conversely, under‐weighting (or directly overlooking) the effect of the country's institutional quality on regional economic development. We present empirical evidence that the national institutional level outweighs the possible effect of lower government tiers have on a region's economic development.

Journal of Regional ScienceVol. 65(4)
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Universitat de València (ES)
Radboud Universiteit, Generalitat Valenciana, Universitat Jaume I, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universitat de Barcelona, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Relative Contributions of National and Regional Institutions to Economic Development — Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, María Teresa Balaguer-Coll, et al. · Journal of Regional Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS