Re-revision following revision of a failed primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England
Re-revision rates following revision rTSA are high with independent risk factors being younger age and instability as primary revision diagnosis. Given the risk profile and low volume of revision cases performed by surgeons, centralizing revision rTSA surgeries to high-volume centers may warrant further exploration to improve outcomes.
Authors
- Peter Reilly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-910X)
- Olivia O’Malley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9674-1553)
- Sanjeeve Sabharwal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-756X)
- Amar Rangan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5452-8578)
- Andrew Davies
Institutions
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- Hull York Medical School (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JSES International
- Published
- 2025-05-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.030
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- British Orthopaedic Association
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Royal College of Surgeons of England