Evaluasi Perbandingan Pembuatan Kanal Dengan Metode Konvensional Dan Metode Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) Pada Proyek Strategis Nasional Jaringan Irigasi Baliase Di Sulawesi Selatan

The implementation of canal construction with an alternative method is to use Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) which is a relatively new technology in industrial construction consisting of synthetic materials (geosynthetic) and cement concrete (cementitious). The GCCM method offers potential advantages over conventional methods, including faster construction time, lower maintenance costs, lower risk of environmental damage, and more consistent and durable channel quality. This study aims to highlight and compare the effectiveness of conventional methods and Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) methods in canal construction. The results of the study indicate that the GCCM method has advantages in terms of structural strength, erosion resistance, and reduced environmental impacts compared to conventional methods. The results of physical tests show that GCCM significantly increases slope stability by reducing soil stoppage up to eight times compared to conventional methods. Under seepage flow conditions, slopes stabilized with GCCM remain solid without structural failure, while slopes with conventional methods experience total collapse. In terms of cost, although the price of GCCM material is higher, savings in labor and implementation duration make it more economical for large-scale projects. The results of this study can be a reference for practitioners and decision makers in choosing the right canal construction method for national strategic projects

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sultra Civil Engineering Journal
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54297/sciej.v6i1.984
Primary Topic
Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluasi Perbandingan Pembuatan Kanal Dengan Metode Konvensional Dan Metode Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) Pada Proyek Strategis Nasional Jaringan Irigasi Baliase Di Sulawesi Selatan

Mahreni Nasution, Regi Suhanda
3 links
Sultra Civil Engineering Journal
Geotechnical and construction materials studies
article

Evaluasi Perbandingan Pembuatan Kanal Dengan Metode Konvensional Dan Metode Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) Pada Proyek Strategis Nasional Jaringan Irigasi Baliase Di Sulawesi Selatan

Mahreni Nasution, Regi Suhanda
article en

Abstract

The implementation of canal construction with an alternative method is to use Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) which is a relatively new technology in industrial construction consisting of synthetic materials (geosynthetic) and cement concrete (cementitious). The GCCM method offers potential advantages over conventional methods, including faster construction time, lower maintenance costs, lower risk of environmental damage, and more consistent and durable channel quality. This study aims to highlight and compare the effectiveness of conventional methods and Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCM) methods in canal construction. The results of the study indicate that the GCCM method has advantages in terms of structural strength, erosion resistance, and reduced environmental impacts compared to conventional methods. The results of physical tests show that GCCM significantly increases slope stability by reducing soil stoppage up to eight times compared to conventional methods. Under seepage flow conditions, slopes stabilized with GCCM remain solid without structural failure, while slopes with conventional methods experience total collapse. In terms of cost, although the price of GCCM material is higher, savings in labor and implementation duration make it more economical for large-scale projects. The results of this study can be a reference for practitioners and decision makers in choosing the right canal construction method for national strategic projects

Sultra Civil Engineering JournalVol. 6(1)
Medan Area University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Geotechnical and construction materials studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.