Interannual variations of evapotranspiration and its response to different drought types in a boreal larch forest in China

• Evapotranspiration (ET) and water budgets in a China’s boreal forest over the 8-growing seasons were quantified. • Atmospheric drought significantly increased ET while soil drought significantly decreased ET. • There was no significant difference in ET between no drought and combined drought. • Atmospheric conditions are the key factors to ET responses to different drought types. • Precipitation regime with larger rainfall events plays the most important role in regulating the IAV of ET. Assessing evapotranspiration (ET) responses to droughts is of great significance for understanding the exchanges of water, carbon, and energy in a changing environment. However, the interannual variation (IAV) of ET and its environmental controls under different drought types in China’s boreal forests remain poorly understood. In this study, we integrated eight years of eddy covariance measurements and environmental observations during growing seasons to evaluate the IAV of ET and the control mechanisms of ET under no drought, atmospheric drought, soil drought, and combined drought conditions. Over the study period, the IAV of ET was relatively small with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 8.6%, whereas the evapotranspiration/precipitation (ET/P) ratio exhibited a great fluctuation with a CV of 24.6%, corresponding to the higher variability in P (CV of 31.2%). Atmospheric drought significantly increased ET by 18.05% than no drought condition, whereas soil drought significantly reduced ET by 19.02%. However, ET showed no significant difference between no drought and combined drought due to the constraint role of low soil water content (SWC) in high atmospheric demand during the combined drought. The indirect and direct driving effects of atmospheric conditions, such as net radiation (Rn), air temperature (Ta), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were the key to ET responses to different drought types. Furthermore, precipitation rather than energy demand or canopy greenness had a greater impact on the IAV of ET. Interestingly, the precipitation regime with larger rainfall events (> 15 mm/day) was mostly related to the IAV of ET. These findings enhance our understanding of the responses of ET to multiple drought types and the intricate relationship between ET and P, highlighting that precipitation patterns due to climate change could potentially increase the complexity of environmental control on ET variations in boreal forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113609
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interannual variations of evapotranspiration and its response to different drought types in a boreal larch forest in China

Liangliang Duan, Xiuling Man, Yiping Hou, Tijiu Cai et al.
2 citations
Ecological Indicators
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

Interannual variations of evapotranspiration and its response to different drought types in a boreal larch forest in China

Liangliang Duan, Xiuling Man, Yiping Hou, Tijiu Cai, Zhipeng Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Evapotranspiration (ET) and water budgets in a China’s boreal forest over the 8-growing seasons were quantified. • Atmospheric drought significantly increased ET while soil drought significantly decreased ET. • There was no significant difference in ET between no drought and combined drought. • Atmospheric conditions are the key factors to ET responses to different drought types. • Precipitation regime with larger rainfall events plays the most important role in regulating the IAV of ET. Assessing evapotranspiration (ET) responses to droughts is of great significance for understanding the exchanges of water, carbon, and energy in a changing environment. However, the interannual variation (IAV) of ET and its environmental controls under different drought types in China’s boreal forests remain poorly understood. In this study, we integrated eight years of eddy covariance measurements and environmental observations during growing seasons to evaluate the IAV of ET and the control mechanisms of ET under no drought, atmospheric drought, soil drought, and combined drought conditions. Over the study period, the IAV of ET was relatively small with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 8.6%, whereas the evapotranspiration/precipitation (ET/P) ratio exhibited a great fluctuation with a CV of 24.6%, corresponding to the higher variability in P (CV of 31.2%). Atmospheric drought significantly increased ET by 18.05% than no drought condition, whereas soil drought significantly reduced ET by 19.02%. However, ET showed no significant difference between no drought and combined drought due to the constraint role of low soil water content (SWC) in high atmospheric demand during the combined drought. The indirect and direct driving effects of atmospheric conditions, such as net radiation (Rn), air temperature (Ta), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were the key to ET responses to different drought types. Furthermore, precipitation rather than energy demand or canopy greenness had a greater impact on the IAV of ET. Interestingly, the precipitation regime with larger rainfall events (> 15 mm/day) was mostly related to the IAV of ET. These findings enhance our understanding of the responses of ET to multiple drought types and the intricate relationship between ET and P, highlighting that precipitation patterns due to climate change could potentially increase the complexity of environmental control on ET variations in boreal forests.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 176
University of British Columbia (CA), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), Northeast Forestry University (CN), Okanagan University College (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.