Spatial Averaging Calculations of 5G Beam-Forming Antennas for EMF Compliance Assessments

When calculating whole-body spatially averaged electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure at cellular base stations utilizing massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) and beam-forming technologies, the typical approach is to use the maximum gain envelope of all horizontal and vertical steering directions of the traffic beam. When considering the vertical steering capability of the antenna, calculations performed from multiple vertical beam directions at maximum gain across the spatial averaging range will result in an overconservative assessment since the traffic beams are not directed at multiple directions simultaneously with the same effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP). A more accurate approach would be to differentiate between multiple vertical tilt steering directions. By calculating the whole-body spatially averaged EMF exposure for each individual tilt or vertical steering direction, a less overly conservative compliance boundary for the beam-forming antenna may be derived.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/eucap63536.2025.10999891
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Averaging Calculations of 5G Beam-Forming Antennas for EMF Compliance Assessments

Rikus Human, D. J. Ludick, R. Swanepoel, Matthew J. Butcher et al.
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
article

Spatial Averaging Calculations of 5G Beam-Forming Antennas for EMF Compliance Assessments

Rikus Human, D. J. Ludick, R. Swanepoel, Matthew J. Butcher, Martin Batt, Kyle Lotter
article en

Abstract

When calculating whole-body spatially averaged electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure at cellular base stations utilizing massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) and beam-forming technologies, the typical approach is to use the maximum gain envelope of all horizontal and vertical steering directions of the traffic beam. When considering the vertical steering capability of the antenna, calculations performed from multiple vertical beam directions at maximum gain across the spatial averaging range will result in an overconservative assessment since the traffic beams are not directed at multiple directions simultaneously with the same effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP). A more accurate approach would be to differentiate between multiple vertical tilt steering directions. By calculating the whole-body spatially averaged EMF exposure for each individual tilt or vertical steering direction, a less overly conservative compliance boundary for the beam-forming antenna may be derived.

nLIGHT (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.