Efficacy of Topical 5% Dapsone Gel Versus 0.1% Adapalene Gel in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of topical 5% Dapsone gel and Adapalene gel 0.1% in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Department of Dermatology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from 16-12-2023 to 15-06-2024. Total 60 patients were selected. The diagnosis of acne vulgaris was made by consultant dermatologist. Informed consent was taken from each patient and discretion of the information was ensured. Local and global GAGS score was calculated. Patients were separated into two groups for Dapsone 5% and Adapalene 0.1% and advised to apply their treatment gel twice daily. At fourth visit GAGS score and efficacy of the treatment were documented. Results: In group A, 80% had mild and 20% had moderate acne while in group B, 70% had mild and 30% had moderately severe acne (p=0.371). Treatment was successful in 86.7% of group A and 56.7% of group B patients (p=0.010). Conclusion: According to this study, there was significant difference between the efficacy of topical 5% Dapsone gel and topical 0.1% Adapalene gel to treat the acne in selected population and dapsone gel can be recommended as a standard treatment for acne vulgaris.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Journal Of South Punjab
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61581/mjsp.vol05/04/04
Primary Topic
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Topical 5% Dapsone Gel Versus 0.1% Adapalene Gel in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris

Ahtisham Abdul Wahid, Tahir Kamal, Zohra Ali, Hina Manzoor et al.
Medical Journal Of South Punjab
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
article

Efficacy of Topical 5% Dapsone Gel Versus 0.1% Adapalene Gel in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris

Ahtisham Abdul Wahid, Tahir Kamal, Zohra Ali, Hina Manzoor, Hafsa Hafeez
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of topical 5% Dapsone gel and Adapalene gel 0.1% in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Department of Dermatology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from 16-12-2023 to 15-06-2024. Total 60 patients were selected. The diagnosis of acne vulgaris was made by consultant dermatologist. Informed consent was taken from each patient and discretion of the information was ensured. Local and global GAGS score was calculated. Patients were separated into two groups for Dapsone 5% and Adapalene 0.1% and advised to apply their treatment gel twice daily. At fourth visit GAGS score and efficacy of the treatment were documented. Results: In group A, 80% had mild and 20% had moderate acne while in group B, 70% had mild and 30% had moderately severe acne (p=0.371). Treatment was successful in 86.7% of group A and 56.7% of group B patients (p=0.010). Conclusion: According to this study, there was significant difference between the efficacy of topical 5% Dapsone gel and topical 0.1% Adapalene gel to treat the acne in selected population and dapsone gel can be recommended as a standard treatment for acne vulgaris.

Medical Journal Of South PunjabVol. 5(4)
Lahore General Hospital (PK), Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.