A Comparative Study on Ray-Tracing and Physical-Optics Methods for the Analysis of Transmitarray Antennas

This study compares the accuracy of two semi-analytical methods based on ray tracing (RT) and physical optics (PO) for the analysis and design of transmitarrays of different sizes. The assessment considers multiple focal-to-diameter ratios and eight unit cells implementing 3-bit uniform phase quantization at 30 GHz. The results, validated by full-wave simulations, demonstrate that both the RT and PO methods yield excellent agreement in standard-profile configurations. However, the RT approach, which assumes the transmitarray to be in the far-field region of the primary feed, provides a wrong evaluation of the gain of low-profile antennas, with errors up to 1.5 dB at 34 GHz. In contrast, the PO method accounts for near-field effects and accurately predicts the transmitarray performance even when the focal distance is comparable to the wavelength. Additionally, the PO method enables the analysis of large antennas with computational efficiency comparable to RT, requiring approximately four minutes for transmitarrays with diameters of 30 wavelengths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/eucap63536.2025.10999620
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on Ray-Tracing and Physical-Optics Methods for the Analysis of Transmitarray Antennas

Francesco Foglia Manzillo, Orestis Koutsos, Ronan Sauleau, Antonio Clemente et al.
1 citations
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
4.99
article

A Comparative Study on Ray-Tracing and Physical-Optics Methods for the Analysis of Transmitarray Antennas

Francesco Foglia Manzillo, Orestis Koutsos, Ronan Sauleau, Antonio Clemente, Andrea Tummolo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compares the accuracy of two semi-analytical methods based on ray tracing (RT) and physical optics (PO) for the analysis and design of transmitarrays of different sizes. The assessment considers multiple focal-to-diameter ratios and eight unit cells implementing 3-bit uniform phase quantization at 30 GHz. The results, validated by full-wave simulations, demonstrate that both the RT and PO methods yield excellent agreement in standard-profile configurations. However, the RT approach, which assumes the transmitarray to be in the far-field region of the primary feed, provides a wrong evaluation of the gain of low-profile antennas, with errors up to 1.5 dB at 34 GHz. In contrast, the PO method accounts for near-field effects and accurately predicts the transmitarray performance even when the focal distance is comparable to the wavelength. Additionally, the PO method enables the analysis of large antennas with computational efficiency comparable to RT, requiring approximately four minutes for transmitarrays with diameters of 30 wavelengths.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Institut d'Électronique et des Technologies du numéRique (FR), Laboratoire d'Électronique des Technologies de l'Information (FR), Université de Rennes (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.