Concept of patron-clientelism as an analytical framework for the study of bilateral asymmetric relations between countries

The article is devoted to the analysis of the emergence and theoretical foundations of the patron-client concept as a new analytical tool for studying cooperation between states in the framework of asymmetric bilateral relations. The process and conditions of the rapid transfer of the patron-client model from anthropological research to a wide range of social sciences, including its adaptation to the needs of Western political science, are highlighted. In a broad sense, patron-client relationships are understood as a broad-based patronage by a powerful actor in exchange for the support and services of a weaker actor. At the same time, it is emphasized that the variability of these asymmetrical relationships is not so much rooted in the relations between the actors themselves, but in the socio-political context. The ideas and views of the American political scientists K. Carney, J. Spanier and K. Shoemaker, who laid the conceptual foundations for the application of the concept of patron-client relations to the study of international relations and world politics, are considered. It is emphasized that the driving force behind the formation of patron-client relations between two states is their significant asymmetry in military capabilities, which encourages the secondary state to see a potential patron as a provider of security. The article specifies four criteria proposed by C. Carney for determining interstate patronage relations – asymmetry, reciprocity, commitment, compliance, among which reciprocity and commitment are the elements that make these relations similar to friendly ones. The author of the article outlines three areas of international political studies where the concept of patron-clientelism is currently used: 1) great power patronage over medium and small states; 2) separatist conflicts; 3) state patronage over insurgent and political groups. The author also identifies promising aspects of theoretical research in this area.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International and Political Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-5206.2025.39.11
Primary Topic
International Relations in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concept of patron-clientelism as an analytical framework for the study of bilateral asymmetric relations between countries

Віктор Пашков
International and Political Studies
International Relations in Latin America
article

Concept of patron-clientelism as an analytical framework for the study of bilateral asymmetric relations between countries

Віктор Пашков
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the emergence and theoretical foundations of the patron-client concept as a new analytical tool for studying cooperation between states in the framework of asymmetric bilateral relations. The process and conditions of the rapid transfer of the patron-client model from anthropological research to a wide range of social sciences, including its adaptation to the needs of Western political science, are highlighted. In a broad sense, patron-client relationships are understood as a broad-based patronage by a powerful actor in exchange for the support and services of a weaker actor. At the same time, it is emphasized that the variability of these asymmetrical relationships is not so much rooted in the relations between the actors themselves, but in the socio-political context. The ideas and views of the American political scientists K. Carney, J. Spanier and K. Shoemaker, who laid the conceptual foundations for the application of the concept of patron-client relations to the study of international relations and world politics, are considered. It is emphasized that the driving force behind the formation of patron-client relations between two states is their significant asymmetry in military capabilities, which encourages the secondary state to see a potential patron as a provider of security. The article specifies four criteria proposed by C. Carney for determining interstate patronage relations – asymmetry, reciprocity, commitment, compliance, among which reciprocity and commitment are the elements that make these relations similar to friendly ones. The author of the article outlines three areas of international political studies where the concept of patron-clientelism is currently used: 1) great power patronage over medium and small states; 2) separatist conflicts; 3) state patronage over insurgent and political groups. The author also identifies promising aspects of theoretical research in this area.

International and Political Studies(39)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
International Relations in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.