Development of a Human Performance Baseline of Lay Error in Targeting

This study pursued two key objectives: first, to create an advanced model that accurately represents a human’s precision in aligning sight crosshairs with the center of a target, otherwise known as <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">lay error</i>; second, to investigate how various engagement conditions (such as target shape, size, range, and motion) influence lay error and determine whether a single error model could be reliably applied across different targets. To address these objectives, a photo-realistic simulation environment using Unreal Engine was developed featuring four different targets, four motion configurations, four levels of zoom, four ranges, three levels of contrast, and four levels of obstructions. After prototyping and evaluation, the simulation environment was used to collect lay error metrics as 110 IRB-approved subjects aligned crosshairs on targets under various conditions. Subjects fired a total of 11,088 shots throughout a set of three different data collection sessions that were completed over 10 months. After data collection, statistical analyses of lay error were conducted including fitting non-Gaussian distribution functions and applying Fitts’ Law to the targeting analysis. Experimental results show that (a) the lay error changes with target type and is greater on closer targets and lower on farther targets for the majority of the subjects who participated in the study; (b) The firing time for most shots is below 10 seconds for most subjects, independent of the test conditions, distance to target, or target type; and (c) although the subjects’ shots were mostly accurate, subjects occasionally had significant errors (outliers) that merit deeper consideration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3571591
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Human Performance Baseline of Lay Error in Targeting

Jennifer Forsythe, Thirimachos Bourlai, Victor Philippe, Nicholas Gans et al.
IEEE Access
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

Development of a Human Performance Baseline of Lay Error in Targeting

Jennifer Forsythe, Thirimachos Bourlai, Victor Philippe, Nicholas Gans, Cody L. Lundberg, Parker Ensing, Alexia Toma
article en

Abstract

This study pursued two key objectives: first, to create an advanced model that accurately represents a human’s precision in aligning sight crosshairs with the center of a target, otherwise known as <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">lay error</i>; second, to investigate how various engagement conditions (such as target shape, size, range, and motion) influence lay error and determine whether a single error model could be reliably applied across different targets. To address these objectives, a photo-realistic simulation environment using Unreal Engine was developed featuring four different targets, four motion configurations, four levels of zoom, four ranges, three levels of contrast, and four levels of obstructions. After prototyping and evaluation, the simulation environment was used to collect lay error metrics as 110 IRB-approved subjects aligned crosshairs on targets under various conditions. Subjects fired a total of 11,088 shots throughout a set of three different data collection sessions that were completed over 10 months. After data collection, statistical analyses of lay error were conducted including fitting non-Gaussian distribution functions and applying Fitts’ Law to the targeting analysis. Experimental results show that (a) the lay error changes with target type and is greater on closer targets and lower on farther targets for the majority of the subjects who participated in the study; (b) The firing time for most shots is below 10 seconds for most subjects, independent of the test conditions, distance to target, or target type; and (c) although the subjects’ shots were mostly accurate, subjects occasionally had significant errors (outliers) that merit deeper consideration.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
University of Georgia (US), DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), CECOM Software Engineering Center (US), United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (US), U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (US)
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.