An Interface Evaluation Model for Usability and Perceived Security

The increasing complexity of the digital world has amplified the importance of both security and usability in user interface design. While numerous approaches address these issues separately, there is a lack of perception-oriented evaluation models that integrate usability and perceived security into a single framework. This paper proposes the Usability and Perceived Security Evaluation Model (UPSEM), which enables developers to assess both dimensions simultaneously during the early stages of interface design. UPSEM incorporates hierarchical criteria based on design factors and groups that influence users’ look-and-feel-driven perceptions of usability and security. The model employs the Analytical Hierarchy Process, a multi-criteria decision-making method, to evaluate interfaces systematically. Expert evaluations were conducted to validate the model, resulting in a final version that includes 25 design factors categorized into three groups. Notably, the study found no consensus among experts on the existence of a trade-off between usability and perceived security, challenging previous assumptions in the literature. The findings demonstrate that UPSEM provides a practical and scientifically grounded metric for identifying interface features requiring improvement. By offering a structured approach to measure usability and perceived security together, UPSEM supports developers in designing user interfaces that are both usable and secure from the outset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3572108
Citations
2
Primary Topic
User Authentication and Security Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Interface Evaluation Model for Usability and Perceived Security

Mehmet Göktürk
2 citations
IEEE Access
User Authentication and Security Systems
6.49
article

An Interface Evaluation Model for Usability and Perceived Security

Mehmet Göktürk
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The increasing complexity of the digital world has amplified the importance of both security and usability in user interface design. While numerous approaches address these issues separately, there is a lack of perception-oriented evaluation models that integrate usability and perceived security into a single framework. This paper proposes the Usability and Perceived Security Evaluation Model (UPSEM), which enables developers to assess both dimensions simultaneously during the early stages of interface design. UPSEM incorporates hierarchical criteria based on design factors and groups that influence users’ look-and-feel-driven perceptions of usability and security. The model employs the Analytical Hierarchy Process, a multi-criteria decision-making method, to evaluate interfaces systematically. Expert evaluations were conducted to validate the model, resulting in a final version that includes 25 design factors categorized into three groups. Notably, the study found no consensus among experts on the existence of a trade-off between usability and perceived security, challenging previous assumptions in the literature. The findings demonstrate that UPSEM provides a practical and scientifically grounded metric for identifying interface features requiring improvement. By offering a structured approach to measure usability and perceived security together, UPSEM supports developers in designing user interfaces that are both usable and secure from the outset.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Gebze Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
User Authentication and Security Systems
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.