Feeding Strategies for PCB Based ME Dipole Antennas at D-Band

This study compares two different feed structures for dual-polarized magnetoelectric (ME) dipole antennas intended for D-band (110–170 GHz) applications. The investigated single-ended and differential feed designs are appropriate for next-generation wireless communication systems because they attain a large impedance bandwidth of 42.8%, effectively spanning the whole D-band spectrum. Although the single-ended feed structure exhibits steady gain and uniform radiation patterns throughout the band, its isolation is not ideal, with levels falling as low as -12 dB at certain frequencies. In contrast, the differential feed structure provides improved polarization purity and good isolation, but at the expense of decreased gain stability and weakened radiation patterns, especially at higher frequencies. Critical performance metrics such as S-parameters, gain, isolation, radiation efficiency, and radiation patterns are evaluated for a thorough comparison of these two feeding systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/eucap63536.2025.10999222
Primary Topic
Antenna Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding Strategies for PCB Based ME Dipole Antennas at D-Band

Kimmo Rasilainen, Marko E. Leinonen, Nuutti Tervo, Aarno Pärssinen et al.
Antenna Design and Analysis
article

Feeding Strategies for PCB Based ME Dipole Antennas at D-Band

Kimmo Rasilainen, Marko E. Leinonen, Nuutti Tervo, Aarno Pärssinen, Adnan Ali
article en

Abstract

This study compares two different feed structures for dual-polarized magnetoelectric (ME) dipole antennas intended for D-band (110–170 GHz) applications. The investigated single-ended and differential feed designs are appropriate for next-generation wireless communication systems because they attain a large impedance bandwidth of 42.8%, effectively spanning the whole D-band spectrum. Although the single-ended feed structure exhibits steady gain and uniform radiation patterns throughout the band, its isolation is not ideal, with levels falling as low as -12 dB at certain frequencies. In contrast, the differential feed structure provides improved polarization purity and good isolation, but at the expense of decreased gain stability and weakened radiation patterns, especially at higher frequencies. Critical performance metrics such as S-parameters, gain, isolation, radiation efficiency, and radiation patterns are evaluated for a thorough comparison of these two feeding systems.

University of Oulu (FI)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Antenna Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.