Counting in: A methodological framework for the accessibility assessment of on-demand transit

This paper addresses an existing methodological and empirical gap by presenting a framework for conducting a regional cumulative accessibility analysis of a transit network with an on-demand component and demonstrating its application to the context of a mid-sized Canadian city. We rely on the concept of accessibility as a performance metric and propose a methodological approach for inferring inputs for accessibility calculations from actual on-demand operations in Edmonton, Canada, to develop the tool for the accessibility assessment of a transit network with an on-demand component. Our empirical findings show that on-demand zones that were introduced with a redesigned bus network saw the largest gains in transit accessibility, and we identified that excluding on-demand transit from accessibility analysis underestimates the systemic effect of the bus network redesign. While the use of the accessibility framework for the assessment of a transit system with an on-demand component offers a meaningful and comprehensive measure of the success both for the planning purposes at the stage of design and for the post-implementation evaluation of either incremental or systemic changes, on-demand service standards must be developed to ensure consistent service provision of on-demand services throughout the day. On the other hand, informed by the findings of our study and publicly available information about the operational costs of service provision we identified that on-demand service provides operational savings over fixed routes if ridership in the area is less or equal to eight passengers an hour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Transportation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2025.100122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting in: A methodological framework for the accessibility assessment of on-demand transit

Bogdan Kapatsila, Emily Grisé, Anson Stewart, Alex Hindle
2 citations
Journal of Public Transportation
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Counting in: A methodological framework for the accessibility assessment of on-demand transit

Bogdan Kapatsila, Emily Grisé, Anson Stewart, Alex Hindle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses an existing methodological and empirical gap by presenting a framework for conducting a regional cumulative accessibility analysis of a transit network with an on-demand component and demonstrating its application to the context of a mid-sized Canadian city. We rely on the concept of accessibility as a performance metric and propose a methodological approach for inferring inputs for accessibility calculations from actual on-demand operations in Edmonton, Canada, to develop the tool for the accessibility assessment of a transit network with an on-demand component. Our empirical findings show that on-demand zones that were introduced with a redesigned bus network saw the largest gains in transit accessibility, and we identified that excluding on-demand transit from accessibility analysis underestimates the systemic effect of the bus network redesign. While the use of the accessibility framework for the assessment of a transit system with an on-demand component offers a meaningful and comprehensive measure of the success both for the planning purposes at the stage of design and for the post-implementation evaluation of either incremental or systemic changes, on-demand service standards must be developed to ensure consistent service provision of on-demand services throughout the day. On the other hand, informed by the findings of our study and publicly available information about the operational costs of service provision we identified that on-demand service provides operational savings over fixed routes if ridership in the area is less or equal to eight passengers an hour.

Journal of Public TransportationVol. 27
University of Iowa (US), University of Alberta (CA), Somerville Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.