Comparative Study of Beef Consumers’ Preferences: Empirical Study from Traditional and Modern Markets

Consumers’ preferences for beef are influenced by the interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes, which affect their purchasing decisions and willingness to pay. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the key attributes influencing consumers’ purchasing power for beef in both traditional and modern markets in Samarinda City. The research was conducted in various markets in Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Province, including traditional markets (Segiri, Ijabah, Kedondong, and Rahmat) and modern markets (Hypermart Bigmall, Farmers Market Mall SCP, Foodmart Mall Lembuswana, and Lotte Grosir), using a questionnaire-based interview method. A total of 80 respondents, comprising 51 women and 29 men, were selected through purposive sampling. Primary data were collected through interviews and questionnaire responses. These were analyzed using chi-square tests and descriptive methods to assess consumers’ preferences for beef product attributes. The results showed that consumers in both traditional and modern markets preferred dark red beef with low-fat content and classified as Group One commercial cuts. The dark red beef with low-fat content is perceived as fresher and healthier (due to the lower number of calories and higher protein levels). The chi-square analysis indicated significant differences in consumers’ preferences for beef attributes between traditional and modern markets in Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Province.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2025.035.01.10
Primary Topic
Global Trade and Competitiveness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Beef Consumers’ Preferences: Empirical Study from Traditional and Modern Markets

Khoiru Indana, Hamdi Mayulu, Anhar Faisal Fanani, Della Puspita Putri Rakhman
Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan
Global Trade and Competitiveness
article

Comparative Study of Beef Consumers’ Preferences: Empirical Study from Traditional and Modern Markets

Khoiru Indana, Hamdi Mayulu, Anhar Faisal Fanani, Della Puspita Putri Rakhman
article en

Abstract

Consumers’ preferences for beef are influenced by the interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes, which affect their purchasing decisions and willingness to pay. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the key attributes influencing consumers’ purchasing power for beef in both traditional and modern markets in Samarinda City. The research was conducted in various markets in Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Province, including traditional markets (Segiri, Ijabah, Kedondong, and Rahmat) and modern markets (Hypermart Bigmall, Farmers Market Mall SCP, Foodmart Mall Lembuswana, and Lotte Grosir), using a questionnaire-based interview method. A total of 80 respondents, comprising 51 women and 29 men, were selected through purposive sampling. Primary data were collected through interviews and questionnaire responses. These were analyzed using chi-square tests and descriptive methods to assess consumers’ preferences for beef product attributes. The results showed that consumers in both traditional and modern markets preferred dark red beef with low-fat content and classified as Group One commercial cuts. The dark red beef with low-fat content is perceived as fresher and healthier (due to the lower number of calories and higher protein levels). The chi-square analysis indicated significant differences in consumers’ preferences for beef attributes between traditional and modern markets in Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Province.

Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu PeternakanVol. 35(1)
Mulawarman University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Global Trade and Competitiveness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.