A human factors accident analysis framework for UAV loss of control in flight

Abstract Sixty uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) accident reports were analysed to identify causal and contributory factors leading to loss of control in flight – the most prominent category of UAV accident (36%). Design and manufacturing errors were dominant causal factors (22 events, 34%) and contributory factors (18 events, 22%). Recovery was not attempted in the majority of events (35 events, 55%). The relationship between operator age, total hours of experience, experience on type and recovery attempts were analysed. The number of accidents decreased as total hours of experience increased as well as attempted recovery. Using this data, existing accident analysis frameworks HFACS, AcciMap and Accident Route Matrix were applied to a sample of accidents and suitability compared. An adapted version of the Accident Route Matrix – Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle is proposed to assist current and future operators to understand causal and contributory factors to mitigate future loss of control in flight accidents and improve the likelihood of recovery. Using the results of the statistical analysis and the data gathered, a new definition for LOC-I for UAVs was defined by considering the different operating environment of UAVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Aeronautical Journal
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2025.24
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A human factors accident analysis framework for UAV loss of control in flight

Mike Bromfield, R. El Safany
5 citations
The Aeronautical Journal
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
24.97
article

A human factors accident analysis framework for UAV loss of control in flight

Mike Bromfield, R. El Safany
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sixty uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) accident reports were analysed to identify causal and contributory factors leading to loss of control in flight – the most prominent category of UAV accident (36%). Design and manufacturing errors were dominant causal factors (22 events, 34%) and contributory factors (18 events, 22%). Recovery was not attempted in the majority of events (35 events, 55%). The relationship between operator age, total hours of experience, experience on type and recovery attempts were analysed. The number of accidents decreased as total hours of experience increased as well as attempted recovery. Using this data, existing accident analysis frameworks HFACS, AcciMap and Accident Route Matrix were applied to a sample of accidents and suitability compared. An adapted version of the Accident Route Matrix – Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle is proposed to assist current and future operators to understand causal and contributory factors to mitigate future loss of control in flight accidents and improve the likelihood of recovery. Using the results of the statistical analysis and the data gathered, a new definition for LOC-I for UAVs was defined by considering the different operating environment of UAVs.

The Aeronautical JournalVol. 129(1337)
University of Birmingham (GB)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
24.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A human factors accident analysis framework for UAV loss of control in flight — Mike Bromfield, R. El Safany · The Aeronautical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS