From Holistic Dialectics to the Worldview of Events—A Critical Examination of Reification Critique Pathways

研究比较卢卡奇与广松涉的物化批判理论，揭示其范式差异及互补性。卢卡奇以黑格尔辩证法为基础，主张无产阶级通过阶级意识觉醒实现主客体统一，扬弃物化结构；广松涉则以“事的世界观”解构实体预设，将社会存在还原为动态关系网络，指认物象化源于主体际关系误认。前者强调历史主体的救赎性，后者聚焦非人格化关系生成。面对数字资本主义的算法统治，二者互补性凸显：卢卡奇的总体性批判揭示数据拜物教的阶级意识遮蔽，广松涉的关系分析解码技术异化的权力拓扑。二者的综合为数字时代批判理论提供新路径，结合阶级意识与关系分析，揭示数据拜物教机制，助力解放政治学重构。This study comparatively analyzes the reification critique theories of Georg Lukács and Hiromatsu Wataru, revealing their paradigmatic divergences and complementarities. Lukács, grounded in Hegelian dialectics, posits that the proletariat achieves the unity of subject-object through awakened class consciousness, thereby sublating reified structures. In contrast, Hiromatsu deconstructs substantialist presuppositions via his “worldview of events” reducing social existence to dynamic relational networks, and identifies “objectification” as stemming from the misrecognition of inter-subjective relations. While the former emphasizes the redemptive role of historical subjectivity, the latter focuses on the depersonalized genesis of relationality. In confronting algorithmic domination within digital capitalism, their complementarity becomes salient: Lukács’ holistic critique exposes how data fetishism obscures class consciousness, whereas Hiromatsu’s relational analysis deciphers the power topology underlying technological alienation. Synthesizing these approaches offers novel pathways for critical theory in the digital age-integrating class consciousness with relational analytics to demystify data fetishism mechanisms and reconstruct emancipatory politics.