Estimating the Pro‐Competitive Effect and Variety Gains Using Firm‐Level Data

ABSTRACT Using Chinese firm‐level data, this article constructs a theoretical model to estimate the welfare effects of domestic and international trade through pro‐competitive effect and variety change. We find that from 2000 to 2013, domestic and international trade have increased Chinese consumer welfare by 1.44%. The pro‐competitive effect and variety gains account for 59% and 41% of the overall welfare gains, respectively. Further decomposition of variety gains shows that variety growth effect increases Chinese consumer welfare by 1.13%, while variety crowding effect causes welfare to decrease by 0.51%. In addition, we also find that domestic trade generates greater consumer welfare than international trade. The estimation results at the CIC three‐digit industry level show that the ‘communication equipment’ industry has the largest trade welfare. Finally, we find that ignoring industry heterogeneity underestimates trade welfare, and that short‐run dynamic trade welfare is greater than long‐run static trade welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13712
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Pro‐Competitive Effect and Variety Gains Using Firm‐Level Data

Yue Sheng, Xingge Xu
World Economy
Global trade and economics
article

Estimating the Pro‐Competitive Effect and Variety Gains Using Firm‐Level Data

Yue Sheng, Xingge Xu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using Chinese firm‐level data, this article constructs a theoretical model to estimate the welfare effects of domestic and international trade through pro‐competitive effect and variety change. We find that from 2000 to 2013, domestic and international trade have increased Chinese consumer welfare by 1.44%. The pro‐competitive effect and variety gains account for 59% and 41% of the overall welfare gains, respectively. Further decomposition of variety gains shows that variety growth effect increases Chinese consumer welfare by 1.13%, while variety crowding effect causes welfare to decrease by 0.51%. In addition, we also find that domestic trade generates greater consumer welfare than international trade. The estimation results at the CIC three‐digit industry level show that the ‘communication equipment’ industry has the largest trade welfare. Finally, we find that ignoring industry heterogeneity underestimates trade welfare, and that short‐run dynamic trade welfare is greater than long‐run static trade welfare.

World EconomyVol. 48(8)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Trường Đại học Kinh tế - Luật, Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.